IntCoOp: Interpretability-Aware Vision-Language Prompt Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image-text contrastive models such as CLIP learn transferable and robust representations for zero-shot transfer to a variety of downstream tasks. However, to obtain strong downstream performances, prompts need to be carefully curated, which can be a tedious engineering task. To address the issue of manual prompt engineering, prompt-tuning is used where a set of contextual vectors are learned by leveraging information from the training data. Despite their effectiveness, existing prompt-tuning frameworks often lack interpretability, thus limiting their ability to understand the compositional nature of images. In this work, we first identify that incorporating compositional attributes (e.g., a "green" tree frog) in the design of manual prompts can significantly enhance image-text alignment scores. Building upon this observation, we propose a novel and interpretable prompt-tuning method named IntCoOp, which learns to jointly align attribute-level inductive biases and class embeddings during prompt-tuning. To assess the effectiveness of our approach, we evaluate IntCoOp across two representative tasks in a few-shot learning setup: generalization to novel classes, and unseen domain shifts. Through extensive experiments across 10 downstream datasets on CLIP, we find that introducing attribute-level inductive biases leads to superior performance against state-of-the-art prompt tuning frameworks. Notably, in a 16-shot setup, IntCoOp improves CoOp by 7.35% in average performance across 10 diverse datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.
Builds on
13 of 29 references.
References · 13
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuningcited by 339
- 2023Visual-Language Prompt Tuning with Knowledge-guided Context Optimizationcited by 307
- 2022Masked Vision and Language Modeling for Multi-modal Representation Learningcited by 66
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Context-aware Prompt Tuning: Advancing In-Context Learning with Adversarial Methodscited by 4
- 2025Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibrationcited by 2
- 2025An Iterative Feedback Mechanism for Improving Natural Language Class Descriptions in Open-Vocabulary Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Joint Semantic Token Selection and Prompt Optimization for Interpretable Prompt Learningcited by 0
- 2026What Does Prompt Learning Change? -A Natural-Language Concept Analysis of Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026What Does Prompt Learning Change? -A Natural-Language Concept Analysis of Vision-Language Models25 Aug 2026
- 2026Joint Semantic Token Selection and Prompt Optimization for Interpretable Prompt Learning6 May 2026
- 2025Prompting without Panic: Attribute-aware, Zero-shot, Test-Time Calibration28 Jun 2025
- 2025An Iterative Feedback Mechanism for Improving Natural Language Class Descriptions in Open-Vocabulary Object Detection21 Mar 2025
- 2024Context-aware Prompt Tuning: Advancing In-Context Learning with Adversarial Methods22 Oct 2024