Experiment-as-Code Labs: A Declarative Stack for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To unleash the full potential of AI for Science, we must untether the agents from a purely digital environment. The agent's ability to control and explore in real-world labs is essential because the physical lab remains foundational to scientific discovery. While some tasks can be performed on a computer (e.g., data analysis, running simulated experiments), Eureka moments could occur at any time while operating lab instruments (e.g., when a scientist notices unexpected clues, intuition may prompt a real-time course change). Although autonomous labs are on the rise, which expose programmable APIs to control scientific instruments via software, bridging the gap between increasingly powerful AI agents and automated lab equipment requires innovation that draws insights from computer systems. We propose a new paradigm called ``Experiment-as-Code (EaC) Labs,'' where a core concept is to encode experiments as declarative configurations that can be compiled down to device-level APIs. AI agents come up with hypotheses and experiments, written as an ensemble of declarative configurations. The systems layer performs program analysis, safety checks, resource assignment, and job orchestration. Finally, programmatic experimentation occurs via actuating the device APIs. This is a general stack that is science-, lab-, and instrument-independent, representing a novel synthesis across the physical, systems, and intelligence layers to unleash the next breakthrough in AI for Science.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 99 references.
References · 17
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 774
- 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 405
- 2023PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Researchcited by 143
- 2019Machine learning for molecular simulationcited by 109
- 2024LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discoverycited by 82
- 2024Hypothesis Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2024Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemcited by 63
- 2024LitLLM: A Toolkit for Scientific Literature Reviewcited by 61
- 2025EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments?cited by 36
- 2024Large Language Models as Biomedical Hypothesis Generators: A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 33
- 2025Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agentscited by 31
- 2021Autonomous synthesis of metastable materialscited by 23
5 more
- 2021Autonomous optimization of nonaqueous battery electrolytes via robotic experimentation and machine learningcited by 16
- 2023Human-In-the-Loop for Bayesian Autonomous Materials Phase Mappingcited by 10
- 2025HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenancecited by 10
- 2024Real-time experiment-theory closed-loop interaction for autonomous materials sciencecited by 3
- 2025Accelerating Discovery in Natural Science Laboratories with AI and Robotics: Perspectives and Challenges from the 2024 IEEE ICRA Workshop, Yokohama, Japancited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.