Layerwise LQR for Geometry-Aware Optimization of Deep Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Geometry-aware optimizers such as Newton and natural gradient can improve conditioning in deep learning, but scalable variants such as K-FAC, Shampoo, and related preconditioners usually impose structural approximations early, often discarding cross-layer interactions induced by the network computation. We introduce Layerwise LQR (LLQR), a framework for learning structured inverse preconditioners under a global layerwise optimal-control objective. The starting point is an exact equivalence: the steepest-descent step under a broad class of divergence-induced quadratic models--including Newton, Gauss-Newton, Fisher/natural-gradient, and intermediate-layer metrics--can be written as a finite-horizon Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) problem. This formulation serves as a reference that exposes the layerwise dynamics and cost matrices encoding the original dense geometry. We then derive a scalable relaxation that learns diagonal, (E-)Kronecker-factored, or other structured inverse preconditioners by minimizing the LQR objective and reusing them across iterations. The resulting optimizer wraps standard methods while retaining a principled connection to second-order geometry, without forming or inverting the global curvature matrix. Experiments on ResNets and Transformers show that LLQR improves optimization dynamics and often translates these gains into improved final test performance, while adding only modest wall-clock overhead. It establishes LLQR as a practical framework for geometry-aware second-order methods and a reference for evaluating scalable approximations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 48 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
- 2018Scaling Neural Machine Translationcited by 204
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 193
11 more
- 2013Revisiting Natural Gradient for Deep Networkscited by 159
- 2018Fast Approximate Natural Gradient Descent in a Kronecker-factored Eigenbasiscited by 146
- 2017Maximum Principle Based Algorithms for Deep Learningcited by 78
- 2018An Optimal Control Approach to Deep Learning and Applications to Discrete-Weight Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2022PipeFisher: Efficient Training of Large Language Models Using Pipelining and Fisher Information Matricescited by 24
- 2019Fast and Furious Convergence: Stochastic Second Order Methods under Interpolationcited by 18
- 2025Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage Thiscited by 17
- 2024AdaFisher: Adaptive Second Order Optimization via Fisher Informationcited by 14
- 2023Structured Inverse-Free Natural Gradient: Memory-Efficient & Numerically-Stable KFACcited by 9
- 2024No More Adam: Learning Rate Scaling at Initialization is All You Needcited by 8
- 2022Scalable K-FAC Training for Deep Neural Networks with Distributed Preconditioningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.