mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Local Truncation Error-Guided Neural ODEs for Large Scale Traffic Forecasting

arXiv 2605.03386 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spatiotemporal forecasting in physical systems, such as large-scale traffic networks, requires modeling a dual dynamic: continuous macroscopic rhythms and discrete, unpredictable microscopic shocks. While Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) excel at capturing smooth evolution, their inherent Lipschitz continuity constraints inevitably cause severe over-smoothing when confronting abrupt anomalies. Recent physics-informed methods attempt to bypass this by penalizing numerical integration errors to enforce manifold smoothness. However, we mathematically reveal that such rigid regularization inherently triggers gradient conflicts and ``attention collapse,'' stripping the model of its sensitivity to anomalies. To resolve this continuity-shock dilemma, we propose Local Truncation Error-Guided Neural ODEs (LTE-ODE). Rather than treating numerical error as a nuisance to be eliminated, we innovatively repurpose the Local Truncation Error (LTE) as an unsupervised forward inductive bias. By mapping the LTE into a dynamic spatial attention mask, our architecture gracefully preserves high-precision continuous ODE evolution in stable regions, while adaptively triggering a discrete compensation branch exclusively at shock points. Trained purely end-to-end without manifold penalties, LTE-ODE achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple large-scale benchmarks, exhibiting exceptional robustness against highly non-linear fluctuations. Furthermore, our ablation on integration steps demonstrates high deployment flexibility, allowing the model to seamlessly adapt to varying hardware memory constraints in real-world applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 45 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2018Revisiting Spatial-Temporal Similarity: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Predictioncited by 122
  3. 2019Dynamic Spatial-Temporal Representation Learning for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.