Mitigating the reconstruction-detection trade-off in VAE-based unsupervised anomaly detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Variational autoencoders are widely used for unsupervised anomaly detection. Model selection however remains an open-question: to remain fully unsupervised, hyperparameters are often chosen to minimize the reconstruction error on normal samples. In this paper, we reveal a trade-off between reconstruction quality and anomaly detection among β-VAE models. Models with constrained latent space reach higher detection metrics but lower reconstruction quality. We also assess the performance variability across random seeds and show it is linked to the distance between normal and abnormal latent distributions. From this analysis, we justify and investigate two methods to mitigate the reconstructiondetection tradeoff: beta-scheduling and the Sparse VAE. The latter especially shows an improvement in detection while maintaining high reconstruction quality.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2019Cyclical Annealing Schedule: A Simple Approach to Mitigating KL Vanishingcited by 191
- 2020Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Images: A Comparative Studycited by 147
- 2022Rethinking Reconstruction Autoencoder-Based Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 59
- 2024Rethinking Autoencoders for Medical Anomaly Detection from A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 23
- 2024Evaluation of pseudo-healthy image reconstruction for anomaly detection with deep generative models: Application to brain FDG PETcited by 10
- 2024Enhancing Reconstruction-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection in Brain MRI with Model and Metric Ensemblescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.