Enhancing RL Generalizability in Robotics through SHAP Analysis of Algorithms and Hyperparameters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite significant advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL), model performance remains highly sensitive to algorithm and hyperparameter configurations, while generalization gaps across environments complicate real-world deployment. Although prior work has studied RL generalization, the relative contribution of specific configurations to the generalization gap has not been quantitatively decomposed and systematically leveraged for configuration selection. To address this limitation, we propose an explainable framework that evaluates RL performance across robotic environments using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify configuration impacts. We establish a theoretical foundation connecting Shapley values to generalizability, empirically analyze configuration impact patterns, and introduce SHAP-guided configuration selection to enhance generalization. Our results reveal distinct patterns across algorithms and hyperparameters, with consistent configuration impacts across diverse tasks and environments. By applying these insights to configuration selection, we achieve improved RL generalizability and provide actionable guidance for practitioners.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 31 references.
References · 13
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 402
- 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
- 2018Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 345
- 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
- 2018Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
- 2022A Survey on Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
- 2023Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 26
- 2024Overcoming the Sim-to-Real Gap: Leveraging Simulation to Learn to Explore for Real-World RLcited by 17
- 2024A Review of Nine Physics Engines for Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 9
- 2021An Open-Source Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning Environment for Robotic Manipulation with Pybulletcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.