mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MPCS: Neuroplastic Continual Learning via Multi-Component Plasticity and Topology-Aware EWC

arXiv 2605.02509 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual learning systems face a fundamental tension between plasticity -- acquiring new knowledge -- and stability -- retaining prior knowledge. We introduce MPCS (Multi-Plasticity Continual System), a neuroplastic architecture that integrates eleven complementary mechanisms: task-driven neurogenesis, Fourier-encoded inputs, EWC regularization, meta-replay, mixed consolidation, hybrid gating, synapse pruning/regeneration, Hebbian updates, task similarity routing, adaptive growth control, and continuous neuron importance tracking. We evaluate MPCS on MEP-BENCH, a multi-track benchmark spanning 31 tasks across regression, classification, logic, and mixed domains, using a three-dimensional Pareto criterion over task performance (Perf), representation diversity (RD), and gradient conflict rate (GCR). Across 15 ablation configurations (3 seeds x 4 tracks x 2000 epochs), MPCS achieves a Normalized Efficiency Score of 94.2, placing it on the Pareto frontier among 9 of 14 gate-passing systems. Key findings: (i) Fourier encoding is the single most critical component (removal drops Perf by 30.7 pp and fails the MEP gate on 14% of tasks); (ii) global EWC degrades performance (NES = -4.2); topology-local EWC reduces this penalty (NES 90.5->91.8) but does not eliminate it; removing EWC entirely yields MPCS_EFFICIENT, the highest-Perf system -- establishing a monotone relationship in the high task-similarity regime (s_bar ~= 0.95): global EWC < topology EWC < no EWC; (iii) the Pareto status assessment is predictive: removing the two Pareto-dominated components (EWC + Hebbian) jointly yields MPCS_EFFICIENT, which improves Perf by 0.6 pp at 4.7x lower compute cost (127 vs. 602 min), validating the Pareto frontier as an actionable model-compression guide.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

10 of 17 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  2. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
  3. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  4. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
  5. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 722
  6. 2017Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networkscited by 694
  7. 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 521
  8. 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
  9. 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 360
  10. 2021Avalanche: an End-to-End Library for Continual Learningcited by 124

Built on by

Not cited yet.