Verifiable Counterfactual Supervision for Process Reward Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Process reward models (PRMs) require supervision that identifies not only whether a reasoning trajectory is correct, but also where the reasoning process first becomes unsupported by its prefix. We frame this requirement as verifiable counterfactual process supervision with paired correct and erroneous trajectories in which the first invalid transition is known, the error mechanism is controlled, and the downstream continuation remains coherent under the corrupted state. Starting from a verified symbolic reasoning chain, our method injects a template-aware error at a selected intermediate step, recomputes all subsequent steps under the corrupted state, and verifies that the injected step is not derivable from its original prefix. The resulting trajectories provide prefix-valid first-error annotations and are translated into aligned natural-language processes for PRM training and evaluation. Experiments show that the synthesized data improve Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks and show preliminary transfer to mathematical process evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025VersaPRM: Multi-Domain Process Reward Model via Synthetic Reasoning Data10 Feb
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction27 Aug
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision5 Jun
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov
Other references · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
- 2024Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 284
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GroundedPRM: Tree-Guided and Fidelity-Aware Process Reward Modeling for Step-Level Reasoning
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Socratic-PRMBench: Benchmarking Process Reward Models with Systematic Reasoning Patterns
- 2025R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling
- 2025Efficient PRM Training Data Synthesis via Formal Verification
- 2026Unleashing Implicit Rewards: Prefix-Value Learning for Distribution-Level Optimization
- 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models
- 2026GR-Ben: A General Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models