mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

APIOT: Autonomous Vulnerability Management Across Bare-Metal Industrial OT Networks

arXiv 2605.02346 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Operational technology (OT) devices run safety-critical physical processes, yet their security testing remains manual and expert-intensive. Autonomous security agents could ease this burden, but bare-metal OT devices are difficult targets because they lack shells, filesystems, and named exploit abstractions, requiring operation through protocol fields and observable device state. We present APIOT (Autonomous Purple-teaming for Industrial OT), a large language model (LLM) agent framework that completes a discovery -> exploitation -> network-level mitigation -> verification workflow without human intervention. We evaluate APIOT in 360 runs on vulnerable firmware and simulators for Zephyr RTOS, spanning five LLMs, three topologies, two impairment levels, and prompt, tooling and two ablations. APIOT completed 90% of primary missions (63/70 across protocols and topologies) and 85% of 150 cross-model runs (128/150) - feasible across models, with substantial variation. Named exploit tools (e.g., a canned CoAP option-overflow) were faster, but protocol primitives (the agent builds the fields itself) produced more reusable mitigations that blocked unseen payload variants. Runtime oversight improved reliability: success rose from 27/30 to 29/30 with rule-based guards and 30/30 when a second LLM added advisory steering. To our knowledge, this is the first end-to-end autonomous attack-remediation demonstration on bare-metal industrial devices, establishing controlled feasibility - not zero-day discovery or production-OT transfer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 45 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  5. 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 196
  6. 2024Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 179
  7. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilitiescited by 125
  8. 2024GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoningcited by 113
  9. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
  10. 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  11. 2026ToolSafe: Enhancing Tool Invocation Safety of LLM-based agents via Proactive Step-level Guardrail and Feedbackcited by 64
  12. 2025Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 26
5 more
  1. 2023LLMs as Hackers: Autonomous Linux Privilege Escalation Attackscited by 25
  2. 2020Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: A Surveycited by 12
  3. 2019P2IM: Scalable and Hardware-independent Firmware Testing via Automatic Peripheral Interface Modeling (extended version)cited by 5
  4. 2017Edge-Fog Cloud: A Distributed Cloud for Internet of Things Computationscited by 3
  5. 2020IoT-Flock: An Open-source Framework for IoT Traffic Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.