mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DBLP: Phase-Aware Bounded-Loss Transport for Burst-Resilient Distributed ML Training

arXiv 2605.01989 ↗First posted 3 May 2026cs.LG cs.NIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributed machine learning (ML) training has become a necessity with the prevalence of billion to trillion-parameter-scale models. While prior work has improved training efficiency from the ML perspective at the application layer, it often fails to address transient congestion events at the network layer that introduce severe tail latency and training-time variability, thereby undermining the quality of service of distributed ML training systems. Existing network optimizations treat all gradients equally and thus fail to integrate sufficient model-training insights into communication protocol design. In this paper, we present Dynamic Bounded-Loss Protocol (DBLP), a burst-resilient, training-phase-aware, and hardware-agnostic transport protocol that incorporates model-level tolerance properties into gradient communication. By dynamically adjusting gradient loss tolerance across training phases, DBLP reduces overall training time and mitigates tail-latency collapse during transient high-loss events (i.e., microbursts). Compared to the current state-of-the-art solution (baseline), DBLP tolerates significantly higher loss while achieving comparable test accuracy, and reduces end-to-end training time by an average of 24.4% and a maximum of 33.9%. At microburst events, DBLP achieves up to 5.88x single-round communication latency speedups over the baseline, preventing burst-induced tail-latency spikes and maintaining stable training performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

Builds on

20 of 40 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  6. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  7. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
  8. 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 718
  9. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
  10. 2019PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimizationcited by 234
  11. 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 208
  12. 2017Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimizationcited by 199
8 more
  1. 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 85
  2. 2017Critical Learning Periods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 78
  3. 2017Poseidon: An Efficient Communication Architecture for Distributed Deep Learning on GPU Clusterscited by 55
  4. 2025Comet: Fine-grained Computation-communication Overlapping for Mixture-of-Expertscited by 46
  5. 2019Priority-based Parameter Propagation for Distributed DNN Trainingcited by 21
  6. 2020Accordion: Adaptive Gradient Communication via Critical Learning Regime Identificationcited by 19
  7. 2023OptiReduce: Resilient and Tail-Optimal AllReduce for Distributed Deep Learning in the Cloudcited by 8
  8. 2025MixNet: A Runtime Reconfigurable Optical-Electrical Fabric for Distributed Mixture-of-Experts Trainingcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.