mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Language for Describing Agentic LLM Contexts

arXiv 2605.01920 ↗First posted 3 May 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly used within larger systems ("LLM agents"). These make a sequence of LLM calls, each call providing the LLM with a combination of instructions, observations, and interaction history. The design of the encoded information and its structure play a central role in the quality of the resulting system, leading to efforts spent on context engineering. It is therefore critical to communicate the composition of the LLM context in a system, and how it evolves over time. Yet, no standard exists for doing so: context construction is typically conveyed through informal prose, ad hoc diagrams, or direct inspection of code, none of which precisely capture how a prompt evolves across interaction steps or how two context representation strategies differ. To remedy this, we introduce the Agentic Context Description Language (ACDL), a language for specifying the structure and dynamics of LLM input contexts in a precise, readable, and standard manner, along with visualizations. ACDL provides constructs for specifying context aspects such as role message sequences, dynamic content, time-indexed references, and conditional or iterative structure, capturing the full architecture of a prompt independently of any particular implementation. ACDL diagrams can be hand drawn on a whiteboard, or written in formal language which can then be rendered. We describe the language, demonstrate it by documenting several existing systems and their variants, and encourage the community to adopt it for describing LLM systems context, both in day-to-day communication and in papers. Tooling, examples and documentation are available at www.acdlang.org.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 13 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  3. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
  4. 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedbackcited by 297
  5. 2024PDL: A Declarative Prompt Programming Languagecited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models
  2. 2026Toward Formalizing LLM-Based Agent Designs through Structural Context Modeling and Semantic Dynamics Analysis
  3. 2026LLM-as-Code: Agentic Programming for Agent Harness
  4. 2025LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research
  5. 2024Learning Agent-based Modeling with LLM Companions: Experiences of Novices and Experts Using ChatGPT & NetLogo Chat
  6. 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMs
  7. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
  8. 2026ACM: Agentic Context Management for Long Horizon Tasks