CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
European financial institutions face mounting regulatory pressure while their security operations centres remain constrained not by data or staffing but by reasoning capacity: enterprise SIEMs cover only a fraction of MITRE ATT&CK techniques, two thirds of SOC teams cannot keep pace with alert volumes, and the majority of breaches are preceded by alerts that are generated but never investigated. Frontier large language models now achieve state-of-the-art results on isolated cybersecurity tasks (one-day vulnerability exploitation, code-level patching, intrusion detection) yet no narrow win constitutes a platform that can compose across functions, persist multi-tenant state, map findings to regulatory regimes and survive an audit. This position paper argues that the right unit of construction is a hybrid multi-agent system in which specialised LLM subagents reason over classical SIEM/XDR telemetry rather than replacing it, share accumulated agent state across institutions through privacy-preserving federation, and can connect to complementary capability packs such as quantum-based authentication, digital twins for adversarial validation, and eBPF-based kernel telemetry. We present CyberAId, a model-agnostic, on-premise-deployable platform in which a Main Agent coordination layer, a Reporting capability, and specialist subagents operate within a shared runtime under bounded human-in-the-loop autonomy, organised around four falsifiable design principles, and aligned with relevant regulations. CyberAId will be validated at four representative financial use cases (client impersonation, anti-money-laundering for payment service providers, retail-banking incident response, and high-frequency-trading resilience) and propose skill-based agent adaptation as the most promising research direction for turning each deployment into a contribution to a continuously refined collective defence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
References · 18
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studiescited by 127
- 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilitiescited by 125
- 2024IRIS: LLM-Assisted Static Analysis for Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 100
- 2024Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilitiescited by 93
- 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflowscited by 57
- 2024KnowPhish: Large Language Models Meet Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Enhancing Reference-Based Phishing Detectioncited by 29
- 2025CORTEX: Collaborative LLM Agents for High-Stakes Alert Triagecited by 14
6 more
- 2025CyberRAG: An Agentic RAG cyber attack classification and reporting toolcited by 11
- 2024ThreatModeling-LLM: Automating Threat Modeling using Large Language Models for Banking Systemcited by 10
- 2025RedTeamLLM: an Agentic AI framework for offensive securitycited by 6
- 2025Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration Achieves Deterministic, High-Quality Decision Support for Incident Responsecited by 6
- 2023Demonstration of quantum-digital paymentscited by 2
- 2026Signal or Noise in Multi-Agent LLM-based Stock Recommendations?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.