Learning in the Fisher Subspace: A Guided Initialization for LoRA Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LoRA adapts large language models (LLMs) by restricting updates to low-rank subspaces of pre-trained weights. While this substantially reduces training cost, the effectiveness of adaptation critically depends on which subspace is chosen at initialization: a poor initialization that allocates capacity to task-irrelevant directions can severely hinder downstream performance. Existing initialization strategies primarily rely on the intrinsic properties of pre-trained weights, implicitly assuming that weight geometry alone reflects task relevance. However, such criteria overlook how the model interacts with the downstream data distribution. In this work, we formulate LoRA initialization as identifying the degree of impact of directions in parameter space under the target data distribution. We argue that data-aware sensitivity, rather than weight-only magnitude, should govern the choice of adaptation subspaces. Building on this perspective, we propose a Fisher-guided framework that leverages curvature information induced by downstream data to characterize how parameter perturbations influence model predictions. This perspective yields a principled, task-dependent criterion for selecting LoRA directions that better align adaptation with the target objective. Empirical results across diverse tasks and modalities demonstrate that data-aware initialization consistently and significantly improves downstream performance over existing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
13 more
- 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
- 2013Revisiting Natural Gradient for Deep Networkscited by 159
- 2023Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuningcited by 150
- 2024LoRA-GA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Gradient Approximationcited by 141
- 2024HydraLoRA: An Asymmetric LoRA Architecture for Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 123
- 2024MiLoRA: Harnessing Minor Singular Components for Parameter-Efficient LLM Finetuningcited by 94
- 2024CodeUltraFeedback: An LLM-as-a-Judge Dataset for Aligning Large Language Models to Coding Preferencescited by 57
- 2025Make LoRA Great Again: Boosting LoRA with Adaptive Singular Values and Mixture-of-Experts Optimization Alignmentcited by 23
- 2024Efficient Learning With Sine-Activated Low-rank Matricescited by 22
- 2024Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning via Explained Variance Adaptationcited by 20
- 2024MTL-LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Multi-Task Learningcited by 17
- 2025UORA: Uniform Orthogonal Reinitialization Adaptation in Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Modelscited by 11
- 2015Traffic Sign Classification Using Deep Inception Based Convolutional Networkscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.