Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Emergent misalignment, where fine-tuning on narrow, non-harmful tasks induces harmful behaviors, poses a key challenge for AI safety in LLMs. Despite growing empirical evidence, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. To uncover the reason behind this phenomenon, we propose a geometric account based on the geometry of feature superposition. Because features are encoded in overlapping representations, fine-tuning that amplifies a target feature also unintentionally strengthens nearby harmful features in accordance with their similarity. We give a simple gradient-level derivation of this effect and empirically test it in multiple LLMs (Gemma-2 2B/9B/27B, LLaMA-3.1 8B, GPT-OSS 20B). Using sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we identify features tied to misalignment-inducing data and to harmful behaviors, and show that they are geometrically closer to each other than features derived from non-inducing data. This trend generalizes across domains (e.g., health, career, legal advice). Finally, we show that a geometry-aware approach, filtering training samples closest to toxic features, reduces misalignment by 34.5%, substantially outperforming random removal and achieving comparable or slightly lower misalignment than LLM-as-a-judge-based filtering. Our study links emergent misalignment to feature superposition, providing a basis for understanding and mitigating this phenomenon.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.
Builds on
32 of 55 references.
References · 32
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2022Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformerscited by 303
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 303
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
20 more
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2023The mechanistic basis of data dependence and abrupt learning in an in-context classification taskcited by 115
- 2023Circuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Modelscited by 105
- 2023Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experiencecited by 103
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 89
- 2025Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviorscited by 86
- 2025SAeUron: Interpretable Concept Unlearning in Diffusion Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 75
- 2025Convergent Linear Representations of Emergent Misalignmentcited by 66
- 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 58
- 2025School of Reward Hacks: Hacking harmless tasks generalizes to misaligned behavior in LLMscited by 58
- 2025Thought Crime: Backdoors and Emergent Misalignment in Reasoning Modelscited by 57
- 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structurecited by 52
- 2024Securing Large Language Models: Threats, Vulnerabilities and Responsible Practicescited by 36
- 2024An X-Ray Is Worth 15 Features: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Radiology Report Generationcited by 23
- 2025On Linear Representations and Pretraining Data Frequency in Language Modelscited by 23
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous Wordscited by 17
- 2025When Bad Data Leads to Good Modelscited by 11
- 2025Simple Mechanistic Explanations for Out-Of-Context Reasoningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Data Attribution of Emergent Misalignment with Persona Featurescited by 1
- 2026TAME: Token Attribution and Masking for Emergent misalignmentcited by 1
- 2026Trait-space Monitoring for Emergent Misalignment During Supervised Finetuningcited by 0
- 2026What Shapes Emergent Misalignment? Insights from Training Dynamics, Model Priors, and Datacited by 0
- 2026Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5cited by 0
- 2026Emergent Misalignment Is Not Magicalcited by 0
- 2026TAME: Token Attribution and Masking for Emergent misalignment15 Sep 2026
- 2026Emergent Misalignment Is Not Magical29 Aug 2026
- 2026Data Attribution of Emergent Misalignment with Persona Features11 Aug 2026
- 2026Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.55 Jul 2026
- 2026What Shapes Emergent Misalignment? Insights from Training Dynamics, Model Priors, and Data18 Jun 2026
- 2026Trait-space Monitoring for Emergent Misalignment During Supervised Finetuning31 May 2026