mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LambdaRankIC: Directly Optimizing Rank IC for Financial Prediction

arXiv 2605.00501 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In financial predictions, the performance of machine learning models is often assessed by Rank IC, which is the Spearman rank correlation between the model predictions and the realized asset returns. Despite its wide adoption, most existing models are trained using regression losses or ranking objectives that may not align with Rank IC. We propose LambdaRankIC, a novel learning-to-rank approach that directly optimizes Rank IC. We circumvent the non-differentiability of the ranking operator by deriving the closed-form expression for the lambda gradients induced by the pairwise rank swaps, which enables efficient gradient-based optimization within the LambdaRank framework. We implement LambdaRankIC as a custom objective in XGBoost. Theoretically, we show that our approach optimizes an upper bound on Rank IC. We evaluate the proposed approach on both simulated and real-world financial data. In simulation studies, LambdaRankIC accurately recovers the true ranking structure in noiseless settings and consistently outperforms regression-based and NDCG-oriented ranking methods under low signal-to-noise ratios and heavy-tailed noise regimes. In empirical experiments using real market data, LambdaRankIC achieves the best out-of-sample performance on evaluation metrics commonly used in finance, including Rank IC, ICIR, monthly return, and Sharpe ratio. These results show that directly optimizing Rank IC can yield substantial improvements over conventional learning objectives in financial predictions when the full-order ranking quality is the primary goal.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

9 of 45 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  3. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 196
  4. 2018Temporal Relational Ranking for Stock Predictioncited by 100
  5. 2019Deep Learning in Asset Pricingcited by 41
  6. 2022Distributionally Robust End-to-End Portfolio Constructioncited by 17
  7. 2020Building Cross-Sectional Systematic Strategies By Learning to Rankcited by 9
  8. 2018Deep Learning in Characteristics-Sorted Factor Modelscited by 7
  9. 2025Growing the Efficient Frontier on Panel Treescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.