mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"What Are You Really Trying to Do?": Co-Creating Life Goals from Everyday Computer Use

arXiv 2605.00497 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in user modeling make it feasible to conduct open-ended inference over a person's everyday computer use. Despite longstanding visions of systems that deeply understand our actions and the purposes they serve in our lives, existing systems only capture what a person is doing in the moment, not why they are doing it, limiting these systems to surface-level support. We introduce striving co-creation, a process for inferring broader life goals from unstructured observations of computer use. Grounded in Activity Theory and Emmons' personal strivings framework, our system progressively constructs a hierarchical representation of a person's activities. Strivings are, however, difficult to fully resolve from observation alone, as the same action can be driven by many different goals. Our system therefore supports an editing interface that gives people agency over how they are understood by the system, feeding their corrections back into subsequent rounds of striving induction. In a week-long field deployment (N=14), we find that our co-creation process produces strivings that participants recognize as representative of their long-term goals and gives them greater agency than baseline methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 98 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  3. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
  4. 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistancecited by 87
  5. 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 78
  6. 2023Goal-Driven Explainable Clustering via Language Descriptionscited by 58
  7. 2023Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolutioncited by 55
  8. 2022Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Languagecited by 54
  9. 2025Values in the Wild: Discovering and Analyzing Values in Real-World Language Model Interactionscited by 52
  10. 2024Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agentscited by 39
  11. 2024GPTCoach: Towards LLM-Based Physical Activity Coachingcited by 29
  12. 2026Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usagecited by 15
7 more
  1. 2013The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Userscited by 11
  2. 2024SummAct: Uncovering User Intentions Through Interactive Behaviour Summarisationcited by 9
  3. 2024Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model-Learned and Human-Encoded Conceptual Relationshipscited by 7
  4. 2025OnGoal: Tracking and Visualizing Conversational Goals in Multi-Turn Dialogue with Large Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2024Vital Insight: Assisting Experts' Context-Driven Sensemaking of Multi-modal Personal Tracking Data Using Visualization and Human-In-The-Loop LLMcited by 5
  6. 2025State Your Intention to Steer Your Attention: An AI Assistant for Intentional Digital Livingcited by 2
  7. 2026AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.