The Power of Order: Fooling LLMs with Adversarial Table Permutations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models have achieved remarkable success and are increasingly deployed in critical applications involving tabular data, such as Table Question Answering. However, their robustness to the structure of this input remains a critical, unaddressed question. This paper demonstrates that modern LLMs exhibit a significant vulnerability to the layout of tabular data. Specifically, we show that semantically-invariant permutations of rows and columns - rearrangements that do not alter the table's underlying information - are sometimes sufficient to cause incorrect or inconsistent model outputs. To systematically probe this vulnerability, we introduce Adversarial Table Permutation, a novel, gradient-based attack that efficiently identifies worst-case permutations designed to maximally disrupt model performance. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that ATP significantly degrades the performance of a wide range of LLMs. This reveals a pervasive vulnerability across different model sizes and architectures, including the most recent and popular models. Our findings expose a fundamental weakness in how current LLMs process structured data, underscoring the urgent need to develop permutation-robust models for reliable, real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
49 of 61 references.
References · 49
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
37 more
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 573
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 560
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
- 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 408
- 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 377
- 2023StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Datacited by 343
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
- 2022Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languagescited by 228
- 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
- 2024Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understandingcited by 188
- 2023Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decompose Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoningcited by 178
- 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 175
- 2021FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answeringcited by 175
- 2022TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across Tablescited by 132
- 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safetycited by 118
- 2022Evaluating the Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 101
- 2023REaLTabFormer: Generating Realistic Relational and Tabular Data using Transformerscited by 94
- 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
- 2024TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarioscited by 77
- 2024TableGPT2: A Large Multimodal Model with Tabular Data Integrationcited by 72
- 2021Towards Robustness Against Natural Language Word Substitutionscited by 69
- 2024Eliminating Position Bias of Language Models: A Mechanistic Approachcited by 65
- 2021How Should Pre-Trained Language Models Be Fine-Tuned Towards Adversarial Robustness?cited by 49
- 2021Generating Syntactically Controlled Paraphrases without Using Annotated Parallel Pairscited by 45
- 2024Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMscited by 40
- 2023HYTREL: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learningcited by 36
- 2023Rethinking Tabular Data Understanding with Large Language Modelscited by 36
- 2023Fool Your (Vision and) Language Model With Embarrassingly Simple Permutationscited by 25
- 2022Certified Robustness Against Natural Language Attacks by Causal Interventioncited by 24
- 2025Why LLM Safety Guardrails Collapse After Fine-tuning: A Similarity Analysis Between Alignment and Fine-tuning Datasetscited by 20
- 2024Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answeringcited by 18
- 2024Exploring the Robustness of Language Models for Tabular Question Answering via Attention Analysiscited by 9
- 2025Table as a Modality for Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025PEARL: Towards Permutation-Resilient LLMscited by 6
- 2025Tabby: A Language Model Architecture for Tabular and Structured Data Synthesiscited by 4
- 2026Beyond Linearization: Attributed Table Graphs for Table Reasoningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.