mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Role-Aware Artificial Intelligence Across Augmentation and Automation in Human-Machine Symbiosis

arXiv 2605.00440 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has rendered the boundary between humanity and computational machinery increasingly ambiguous. In the presence of more interwoven relationships within human-machine symbiosis, the very notion of AI-generated information becomes difficult to define, as such information arises not from either humans or machines in isolation, but from their mutual shaping. At times AI acts in place of the human, automating the task; at others it extends what the human can do, augmenting their capability. Therefore, a more pertinent question lies not merely in whether AI has participated, but in how it has participated. In general, the role assumed by AI is often specified, either implicitly or explicitly, in the input prompt, yet becomes less apparent or altogether unobservable when the generated content alone is available. Once detached from the dialogue context, the functional role may no longer be traceable. This study considers the problem of tracing the functional role played by AI in natural language generation. A methodology is proposed to infer the latent role specified by the prompt, embed this role into the content during the probabilistic generation process and subsequently recover the nature of AI participation from the resulting text. Experimentation is conducted under a representative scenario in which AI acts either as an assistive agent that edits human-written content or as a creative agent that generates new content from a brief concept. The experimental results support the validity of the proposed methodology in terms of discrimination between roles, robustness against perturbations and preservation of linguistic quality. We envision that this study may contribute to future research on the ethics of AI with regard to whether AI has been used fairly, transparently and appropriately.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  6. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  7. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  8. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  9. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  10. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  11. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  12. 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 208
6 more
  1. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  2. 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
  3. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 118
  4. 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
  5. 2016A Thorough Examination of the CNN/Daily Mail Reading Comprehension Taskcited by 71
  6. 2023Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal Learnerscited by 65

Built on by

Not cited yet.