Structure-Aware Chunking for Tabular Data in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Multimodal RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Tabular documents such as CSV and Excel files are widely used in enterprise data pipelines, yet existing chunking strategies for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are primarily designed for unstructured text and do not account for tabular structure. We propose a structure-aware tabular chunking (STC) framework that operates on row-level units by constructing a hierarchical Row Tree representation, where each row is encoded as a key-value block. STC performs token-constrained splitting aligned with structural boundaries and applies overlap-free greedy merging to produce dense, non-overlapping chunks. This design preserves semantic relationships between fields within a row while improving token utilization and reducing fragmentation. Across evaluations on the MAUD dataset, STC reduces chunk count by up to 40% and 56% compared to standard recursive and key-value based baselines, respectively, while improving token utilization and processing efficiency. In retrieval benchmarks, STC improves MRR from 0.3576 to 0.5945 in a hybrid setting and increases Recall@1 from 0.366 to 0.754 in BM25-only retrieval. These results demonstrate that preserving structure during chunking improves retrieval performance, highlighting the importance of structure-aware chunking for RAG over tabular data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.
Builds on
9 of 14 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026A Systematic Investigation of Document Chunking Strategies and Embedding Sensitivity7 Mar
- 2025Reconstructing Context: Evaluating Advanced Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation28 Apr
Other references · 7
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
- 2018Text Segmentation as a Supervised Learning Taskcited by 76
- 2025cAST: Enhancing Code Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Structural Chunking via Abstract Syntax Treecited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Structure-Aware Semantic Chunking with Title-Chain Prefixes: A 1600-Query Evaluation and the Measurement Trap in Text-Transform Ablations
- 2026Web Retrieval-Aware Chunking (W-RAC) for Efficient and Cost-Effective Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
- 2026Evaluating Chunking Strategies For Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oil and Gas Enterprise Documents
- 2026Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG
- 2026Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion
- 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?
- 2026Document Retrieval-Aware Chunking (D-RAC): Universal Retrieval-Aware Ingestion of Enterprise Documents via PDF Normalization and Multimodal Markdown Conversion
- 2025A New HOPE: Domain-agnostic Automatic Evaluation of Text Chunking