mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeGenTWeb: A First Look at LLM-dominant Websites

arXiv 2605.00087 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.NI cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many recent news reports have claimed that content generated by large language models (LLMs) is taking over the web. However, these claims are typically not based on a representative sample of the web and the methodology underlying them is often opaque. Moreover, when aiming to minimize the chances of falsely attributing human-authored content to LLMs, we find that detectors of LLM-generated text perform much worse than advertised. Consequently, we lack an understanding of the true prevalence and characteristics of LLM content on the web. We describe DeGenTWeb which systematically identifies LLM-dominant websites: sites whose content has been generated using LLMs with little human input. We show how to adapt detectors of LLM-generated text for use on web pages, and how to aggregate detection results from multiple pages on a site for accurate site-level categorization. Using DeGenTWeb, we find that LLM-dominant sites are highly prevalent both in data from Common Crawl and in Bing's search results, and that this share is growing over time. We also show that continuing to accurately identify such sites appears challenging given the capabilities of the latest LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 76 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2021Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gophercited by 1,199
  3. 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
  4. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  5. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  6. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  7. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  8. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
  9. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  10. 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 75
  11. 2024The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Ratescited by 66
  12. 2024Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Mediacited by 35
11 more
  1. 2023A Representative Study on Human Detection of Artificially Generated Media Across Countriescited by 22
  2. 2024RAFT: Realistic Attacks to Fool Text Detectorscited by 8
  3. 2025How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysiscited by 8
  4. 2024The Impact of Prompts on Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Textcited by 6
  5. 2025Exploiting Leaderboards for Large-Scale Distribution of Malicious Modelscited by 5
  6. 2025Machines in the Crowd? Measuring the Footprint of Machine-Generated Text on Redditcited by 4
  7. 2024Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using Common Crawlcited by 3
  8. 2025Machine Text Detectors are Membership Inference Attackscited by 2
  9. 2026The ATOM Report: Measuring the Open Language Model Ecosystemcited by 2
  10. 2021The Internet with Privacy Policies: Measuring The Web Upon Consentcited by 1
  11. 2026SearchLLM: Detecting LLM Paraphrased Text by Measuring the Similarity with Regeneration of the Candidate Source via Search Enginecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.