Shuffling-Aware Optimization for Private Vector Mean Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study d-dimensional unbiased mean estimation in the single-message shuffle model, where each user sends a single privatized message and the analyzer only observes the shuffled multiset of reports. While minimax-optimal mechanisms are well understood in the local differential privacy setting, the corresponding notion of optimality after shuffling has remained largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the recently proposed shuffle index and use it to formulate the post-shuffling mechanism design problem as an explicit optimization problem. We then establish a minimax lower bound on the achievable mean squared error in terms of the shuffle index, which implies that mechanisms that are optimal under LDP can become suboptimal once shuffling is applied. Finally, we construct an asymptotically minimax optimal mechanism in the high privacy regime, which as a consequence achieves a privacy-utility trade-off nearly identical to that of the central Gaussian mechanism.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
19 of 25 references.
References · 19
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 170
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
- 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
- 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
- 2015Statistical Query Algorithms for Mean Vector Estimation and Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 41
- 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
- 2022Optimal Algorithms for Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacycited by 36
7 more
- 2023Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimationcited by 22
- 2024How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?cited by 22
- 2021Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single Messagecited by 18
- 2021Renyi Differential Privacy of the Subsampled Shuffle Model in Distributed Learningcited by 6
- 2024Private Vector Mean Estimation in the Shuffle Model: Optimal Rates Require Many Messagescited by 5
- 2022Aggregation and Transformation of Vector-Valued Messages in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2026Analysis of Shuffling Beyond Pure Local Differential Privacycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.