Detecting is Easy, Adapting is Hard: Local Expert Growth for Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning under Distribution Shift
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot locomotion and manipulation
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) agents can perform well on the training distribution, but often break down once the test environment shifts. In visual MBRL, recognizing that a shift has occurred is often the easier part; the harder part is turning that recognition into useful action-level correction. We study several ways of responding to shift, including planning penalties, direct fine-tuning, global residual correction, and coarse gating. In our experiments, these approaches either do not improve closed-loop control or hurt in-distribution (ID) performance. Based on these negative results, we propose JEPA-Indexed Local Expert Growth. The method uses a frozen JEPA representation only for problem indexing, while cluster-specific residual experts add local action corrections on top of the original controller. The baseline controller itself is not modified. Using paired-bootstrap evaluation, we find that the original naive-preference variant is not stable under stricter testing. In contrast, the harder-pair variant produces statistically significant OOD improvements on all four evaluated shift conditions while preserving ID performance. The learned experts also remain useful when the same shift is encountered again, which supports the view of adaptation as incremental knowledge growth rather than repeated full retraining. We further show that automatic ID rejection can be achieved with simple density models, whereas fine-grained discrimination among OOD sub-families is limited by the representation. Overall, the results indicate that, for visual MBRL under distribution shift, the main challenge is not simply noticing that the environment has changed, but applying the right local action correction after the change has been recognized.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot locomotion and manipulation, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 22 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
22 of 22 references.
References · 22
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
10 more
- 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
- 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 451
- 2015Policy Distillationcited by 440
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 274
- 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixelscited by 273
- 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 219
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2018Residual Policy Learningcited by 164
- 2020Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Soft Modularizationcited by 143
- 2024Rethinking Out-of-Distribution Detection for Reinforcement Learning: Advancing Methods for Evaluation and Detectioncited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Pre-trained Visual Representations Generalize Where it Matters in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Self-Consistent Model-based Adaptation for Visual Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Large Model: A Survey
- 2026VIGOR: Zero-Shot Visual Generalization via Latent-Space Consistency in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Mitigating Distribution Shift in Model-based Offline RL via Shifts-aware Reward Learning
- 2024The Surprising Ineffectiveness of Pre-Trained Visual Representations for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Prioritized Rollouts for Efficient World Model-based Vision-Language-Action Policy Optimization
- 2026KAGE-Bench: Fast Known-Axis Visual Generalization Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning