mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tree-of-Text: A Tree-based Prompting Framework for Table-to-Text Generation in the Sports Domain

arXiv 2604.26501 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generating sports game reports from structured tables is a complex table-to-text task that demands both precise data interpretation and fluent narrative generation. Traditional model-based approaches require large, annotated datasets, while prompt-based methods using large language models (LLMs) often struggle with hallucination due to weak table comprehension. To overcome these challenges, we propose Tree-of-Text, a tree-structured prompting framework that guides LLMs through a three-stage generation process: (1) Content Planning, where relevant operations and arguments are selected from the input tables; (2) Operation Execution, which breaks down large tables into manageable sub-tables; and (3) Content Generation, where short textual outputs are merged and rewritten into a cohesive report. Experiments show that our method outperforms existing methods on ShuttleSet+, leads in RG and CO metrics on RotoWire-FG, and excels in CS and CO on MLB with roughly 40% of the time and cost of Chain-of-Table. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of Tree-of-Text and suggest a promising direction for prompt-based table-to-text generation in the sports domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

Builds on

12 of 26 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 425
  3. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 267
  4. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  5. 2024Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understandingcited by 185
  6. 2018Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planningcited by 106
  7. 2019Data-to-text Generation with Entity Modelingcited by 45
  8. 2021Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planningcited by 34
  9. 2020Revisiting Challenges in Data-to-Text Generation with Fact Groundingcited by 27
  10. 2022Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planningcited by 17
  11. 2023Benchmarking Stroke Forecasting with Stroke-Level Badminton Datasetcited by 8
  12. 2020Neural Data-to-Text Generation with Dynamic Content Planningcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.