mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hierarchical adaptive control for real-time dynamic inference at the edge

arXiv 2604.26470 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial systems increasingly depend on Machine Learning (ML), and operate on heterogeneous nodes that must satisfy tight latency, energy, and memory constraints. Dynamic ML models, which reconfigure their computational footprint at runtime, promise high energy efficiency and lower average latency for modest accuracy tradeoffs; however, their deployment is complex due to the additional hyperparameters they rely on. These hyperparameters, controlling the accuracy versus average latency tradeoff, are often tuned on a calibration dataset that must match the test time distribution, an assumption that rarely holds in real-world scenarios, leading to suboptimal operational conditions, possibly below static models. We propose a two-tier adaptive architecture that co-optimizes model and system decisions. At the global level, a scheduler configures and deploys, for each edge node, a cascade of classifiers composed of lightweight specialized models and a generalist fallback, satisfying latency and memory constraints. At the node level, a local controller tracks data drifts and hardware resources, enabling or disabling specialized predictors (SP) to preserve high energy efficiency and avoid latency-constraint violations under varying conditions. This design allows longer operating times without forcing a global redeployment step, and enables efficient execution in case of an unreachable remote global controller. We evaluate the approach on two datasets under controlled distribution mismatch scenarios, showing average per-inference reductions of latency up to 2.45x and energy up to 2.86x, with less than 4% accuracy drop compared to static baselines. Our contributions are:(1) a budgeted SP-cascade formulation that preserves worst-case latency constraints;(2) a hierarchical controller that maintains efficiency under data and resource changes; and (3) an experimental evaluation on embedded hardware.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

Builds on

6 of 15 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
  2. 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 527
  3. 2019Machine Learning at the Network Edge: A Surveycited by 84
  4. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Model Quantization for Deep Neural Networks in Image Classificationcited by 65
  5. 2017IDK Cascades: Fast Deep Learning by Learning not to Overthinkcited by 48
  6. 2023Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challengescited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.