mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness Evaluation of a Foundation Segmentation Model Under Simulated Domain Shifts in Abdominal CT: Implications for Health Digital Twin Deployment

arXiv 2604.25685 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation segmentation models such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM) have demonstrated strong generalization across natural images; however, their robustness under clinically realistic medical imaging domain shifts remains insufficiently quantified. We present a systematic slice-level robustness audit of SAM (ViT-B) for spleen segmentation in abdominal CT using 1,051 nonempty slices from 41 volumes in the Medical Segmentation Decathlon. A standardized ground-truth-derived bounding-box protocol was used to isolate encoder robustness from prompt uncertainty. Controlled perturbations simulating inter-scanner variability, including Gaussian noise, blur, contrast scaling, gamma correction, and resolution mismatch, were applied across ten conditions. The clean baseline achieved a mean Dice score of 0.9145 (95% CI: [0.909, 0.919]) with a failure rate of 0.67%. Across all perturbations, the absolute mean DeltaDice remained below 0.01. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction identified statistically significant but small-magnitude changes under selected conditions, while McNemar analysis showed no significant increase in failure probability. These findings indicate that SAM exhibits stable segmentation behavior under moderate CT domain shifts, supporting its role as a robust foundation baseline for medical image segmentation research. As health digital twins increasingly incorporate foundation segmentation models for anatomical modeling and organ-level monitoring, formal characterization of robustness under real-world imaging variability is a necessary step toward trustworthy deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  2. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  3. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  4. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  5. 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 226
  6. 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 190
  7. 2019Machine Learning with Multi-Site Imaging Data: An Empirical Study on the Impact of Scanner Effectscited by 40

Built on by

Not cited yet.