mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech

arXiv 2604.25476 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2026cs.SD cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard text-to-speech (TTS) evaluation measures intelligibility (WER, CER) and overall naturalness (MOS, UTMOS) but does not quantify accent. A synthesiser may score well on all four yet sound non-native on features that are phonemic in the target language. For Indic languages, these features include retroflex articulation, aspiration, vowel length, and the Tamil retroflex approximant (letter zha). We present PSP, the Phoneme Substitution Profile, an interpretable, per-phonological-dimension accent benchmark for Indic TTS. PSP decomposes accent into six complementary dimensions: retroflex collapse rate (RR), aspiration fidelity (AF), vowel-length fidelity (LF), Tamil-zha fidelity (ZF), Frechet Audio Distance (FAD), and prosodic signature divergence (PSD). The first four are measured via forced alignment plus native-speaker-centroid acoustic probes over Wav2Vec2-XLS-R layer-9 embeddings; the latter two are corpus-level distributional distances. In this v1 we benchmark four commercial and open-source systems (ElevenLabs v3, Cartesia Sonic-3, Sarvam Bulbul, Indic Parler-TTS) on Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil pilot sets, with a fifth system (Praxy Voice) included on all three languages, plus an R5->R6 case study on Telugu. Three findings: (i) retroflex collapse grows monotonically with phonological difficulty Hindi < Telugu < Tamil (~1%, ~40%, ~68%); (ii) PSP ordering diverges from WER ordering -- commercial WER-leaders do not uniformly lead on retroflex or prosodic fidelity; (iii) no single system is Pareto-optimal across all six dimensions. We release native reference centroids (500 clips per language), 1000-clip embeddings for FAD, 500-clip prosodic feature matrices for PSD, 300-utterance golden sets per language, scoring code under MIT, and centroids under CC-BY. Formal MOS-correlation is deferred to v2; v1 reports five internal-consistency signals plus a native-audio sanity check.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 20 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 589
  2. 2022FLEURS: Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speechcited by 458
  3. 2022UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 381
  4. 2022The VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 57
  5. 2021Towards Building ASR Systems for the Next Billion Userscited by 45
  6. 2022Towards Building Text-To-Speech Systems for the Next Billion Userscited by 27
  7. 2025Pairwise Evaluation of Accent Similarity in Speech Synthesiscited by 4
  8. 2026Quantifying Speaker Embedding Phonological Rule Interactions in Accented Speech Synthesiscited by 4
  9. 2026Learning-free L2-Accented Speech Generation using Phonological Rulescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.