Model-Aware Data Cleaning for Tabular Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) achieve state-of-the-art zero-shot accuracy on small tabular datasets, but their in-context learning assumes approximately clean inputs: real- world missing values, outliers, and duplicates create a prior mismatch that degrades both accuracy and calibration. We study reinforcement learning for tabular data cleaning, a learned policy that sequences cleaning operators and introduce L2C-TFM with a model-aware reward (TFMAwareReward). We are explicit about what this reward optimizes: it regularizes the Wasserstein distance between the cleaned and the original (dirty) data, a distributional-stability term, which we measure as a diagnostic. Across six experiments on ten OpenML datasets: (i) three of seven reward designs collapse to degenerate strategies, so reward engineering is non-trivial; (ii) under an 8-seed repeated-holdout protocol the model-aware reward matches a random-forest-reward baseline on accuracy (p=0.38), with a benefit confined to minority-class macro-F1 under class imbalance that is partly a reward-agnostic calibrated-threshold effect; and (iii) a policy pre-trained on one dataset transfers to held-out datasets. A diagnostic analysis shows that the two distances are distinct objectives: cleaning tends to move data away from the prior, and prior-distance, not distance-to-dirty, is what tracks downstream quality. We therefore treat prior alignment as a motivating objective and a target for future work, not a property of the reward evaluated here. Code, datasets, and the nested evaluation harness are available at https://github.com/LaureBerti/Learn2Clean/tree/master/Learn2Clean_TFM.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2026.
Builds on
11 of 33 references.
References · 11
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 267
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 202
- 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
- 2021AlphaD3M: Machine Learning Pipeline Synthesiscited by 24
- 2016Automating biomedical data science through tree-based pipeline optimizationcited by 21
- 2023DiffPrep: Differentiable Data Preprocessing Pipeline Search for Learning over Tabular Datacited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.