Interoceptive machine framework: Toward interoception-inspired regulatory architectures in artificial intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This review proposes an integrative framework grounded on interoception and embodied AI-termed the interoceptive machine framework-that translates biologically inspired principles of internal-state regulation into computational architectures for adaptive autonomy. Interoception, conceived as the monitoring, integration, and regulation of internal signals, has proven relevant for understanding adaptive behavior in biological systems. The proposed framework organizes interoceptive contributions into three functional principles: homeostatic, allostatic, and enactive, each associated with distinct computational roles: internal viability regulation, anticipatory uncertainty-based re-evaluation, and active data generation through interaction. These principles are not intended as direct neurophysiological mappings, but as abstractions that inform the design of artificial agents with improved self-regulation and context-sensitive behavior. By embedding internal state variables and regulatory loops within these principles, AI systems can achieve more robust decision-making, calibrated uncertainty handling, and adaptive interaction strategies, particularly in uncertain and dynamic environments. This approach provides a concrete and testable pathway toward agents capable of functionally grounded self-regulation, with direct implications for human-computer interaction and assistive technologies. Ultimately, the interoceptive machine framework offers a unifying perspective on how internal-state regulation can enhance autonomy, adaptivity, and robustness in embodied AI systems
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 129 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 129 references.
References · 21
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
9 more
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2022Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMscited by 220
- 2013Empowerment -- an Introductioncited by 65
- 2020Deep Learning and the Global Workspace Theorycited by 35
- 2023World Models and Predictive Coding for Cognitive and Developmental Robotics: Frontiers and Challengescited by 35
- 2020Avoiding Side Effects By Considering Future Taskscited by 32
- 2024A social path to human-like artificial intelligencecited by 20
- 2023The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neurosciencecited by 18
- 2014Enaction-Based Artificial Intelligence: Toward Coevolution with Humans in the Loopcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.