A Divergence-Based Method for Weighting and Averaging Model Predictions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper uses a minimum divergence framework to introduce a new way of calculating model weights that can be used to average probabilistic predictions from statistical and machine learning models. The method is general and can be applied regardless of whether the models under consideration are fit to data using frequentist, Bayesian, or some other fitting method. The proposed method is motivated in two different ways and is shown empirically to perform better than or on a par with standard model averaging methods, including model stacking and model averaging that relies on Akaike-style negative exponentiated model weighting, especially when the sample size is small. Our theoretical analysis explains why the method has a small-sample advantage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.
Builds on
8 of 60 references.
References · 8
- 2013A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributionscited by 175
- 2015Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAICcited by 110
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 88
- 2013Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian modelscited by 52
- 2017Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributionscited by 39
- 2018The Many Faces of Exponential Weights in Online Learningcited by 33
- 2021Bayesian hierarchical stacking: Some models are (somewhere) usefulcited by 14
- 2021Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inferencecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.