mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inference

arXiv 2106.05010 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian model averaging, obtained as the expectation of a likelihood function by a posterior distribution, has been widely used for prediction, evaluation of uncertainty, and model selection. Various approaches have been developed to efficiently capture the information in the posterior distribution; one such approach is the optimization of a set of models simultaneously with interaction to ensure the diversity of the individual models in the same way as ensemble learning. A representative approach is particle variational inference (PVI), which uses an ensemble of models as an empirical approximation for the posterior distribution. PVI iteratively updates each model with a repulsion force to ensure the diversity of the optimized models. However, despite its promising performance, a theoretical understanding of this repulsion and its association with the generalization ability remains unclear. In this paper, we tackle this problem in light of PAC-Bayesian analysis. First, we provide a new second-order Jensen inequality, which has the repulsion term based on the loss function. Thanks to the repulsion term, it is tighter than the standard Jensen inequality. Then, we derive a novel generalization error bound and show that it can be reduced by enhancing the diversity of models. Finally, we derive a new PVI that optimizes the generalization error bound directly. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the performance of the proposed PVI compares favorably with existing methods in the experiment.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  3. 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 498
  4. 2018Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Samplingcited by 166
  5. 2017Stein Variational Gradient Descent as Gradient Flowcited by 149
  6. 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
  7. 2020A Non-Asymptotic Analysis for Stein Variational Gradient Descentcited by 61
  8. 2017Gradient Estimators for Implicit Modelscited by 58
  9. 2018A Unified Particle-Optimization Framework for Scalable Bayesian Samplingcited by 44
  10. 2017Stein Variational Policy Gradientcited by 42
  11. 2019Function Space Particle Optimization for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 41
  12. 2020Second Order PAC-Bayesian Bounds for the Weighted Majority Votecited by 34
2 more
  1. 2018GDPP: Learning Diverse Generations Using Determinantal Point Processcited by 26
  2. 2019Note on the bias and variance of variational inferencecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.