Improving Robustness of Tabular Retrieval via Representational Stability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based table retrieval systems flatten structured tables into token sequences, making retrieval sensitive to the choice of serialization even when table semantics remain unchanged. We show that semantically equivalent serializations, such as textttcsv, texttttsv, texttthtml, textttmarkdown, and textttddl, can produce substantially different embeddings and retrieval results across multiple benchmarks and retriever families. To address this instability, we treat serialization embedding as noisy views of a shared semantic signal and use its centroid as a canonical target representation. We show that centroid averaging suppresses format-specific variation and can recover the semantic content common to different serializations when format-induced shifts differ across tables. Empirically, centroid representations outrank individual formats in aggregate pairwise comparisons across textttMPNet, textttBGE-M3, textttReasonIR, and textttSPLADE. We further introduce a lightweight residual bottleneck adapter on top of a frozen encoder that maps single-serialization embeddings towards centroid targets while preserving variance and enforcing covariance regularization. The adapter improves robustness for several dense retrievers, though gains are model-dependent and weaker for sparse lexical retrieval. These results identify serialization sensitivity as a major source of retrieval variance and show the promise of post hoc geometric correction for serialization-invariant table retrieval.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 24 references.
References · 18
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
- 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 283
- 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 233
- 2022VICRegL: Self-Supervised Learning of Local Visual Featurescited by 118
- 2023Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Studycited by 116
- 2021TABBIE: Pretrained Representations of Tabular Datacited by 111
- 2020TUTA: Tree-based Transformers for Generally Structured Table Pre-trainingcited by 100
- 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 90
6 more
- 2021Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrievalcited by 74
- 2021MATE: Multi-view Attention for Table Transformer Efficiencycited by 54
- 2015On Invariance and Selectivity in Representation Learningcited by 18
- 2016Local Group Invariant Representations via Orbit Embeddingscited by 12
- 2021Mean Embeddings with Test-Time Data Augmentation for Ensembling of Representationscited by 6
- 2022An Embedding-Dynamic Approach to Self-supervised Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.