mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mammographic Lesion Segmentation with Lightweight Models: A Comparative Study

arXiv 2604.23899 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, with mammography as the primary screening tool. While deep learning models have shown strong performance in lesion segmentation, most rely on computationally intensive architectures that limit their use in resource-constrained environments. This study evaluates the performance and efficiency of lightweight models for mammographic lesion segmentation. Architectures including MobileNetV2, EfficientNet Lite, FPN, and Fast-SCNN were compared against a U-Net baseline using the INbreast dataset with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using Dice score, Intersection over Union (IoU), and Recall, alongside model complexity. MobileNetV2 with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SCSE) achieved the best performance, with a Dice score of 0.5766 while using approximately 75% fewer parameters than U-Net. Cross-dataset evaluation on the DMID dataset showed reduced accuracy due to domain shift but preserved recall. These results demonstrate that lightweight architectures offer a practical balance between performance and efficiency for deployable CAD systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 51 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  7. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  8. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  9. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  10. 2016ENet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-Time Semantic Segmentationcited by 291
  11. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
  12. 2019Fast-SCNN: Fast Semantic Segmentation Networkcited by 124
6 more
  1. 2018Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze & Excitation in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 120
  2. 2019Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screeningcited by 94
  3. 2018Combo Loss: Handling Input and Output Imbalance in Multi-Organ Segmentationcited by 76
  4. 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 58
  5. 2020An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localizationcited by 43
  6. 2024LV-UNet: A Lightweight and Vanilla Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.