mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph Memory Transformer (GMT)

arXiv 2604.23862 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate whether the Feed-Forward Network (FFN) sublayer in a decoder-only transformer can be replaced by an explicit learned memory graph while preserving the surrounding autoregressive architecture. The proposed Graph Memory Transformer (GMT) keeps causal self-attention intact, but replaces the usual per-token FFN transformation with a memory cell that routes token representations over a learned bank of centroids connected by a learned directed transition matrix. In the base GMT v7 instantiation studied here, each of 16 transformer blocks contains 128 centroids, a 128 * 128 edge matrix, gravitational source routing, token-conditioned target selection, and a gated displacement readout. The cell therefore returns movement from an estimated source memory state toward a target memory state, rather than a retrieved value. The resulting model is a fully decoder-only language model with 82.2M trainable parameters and no dense FFN sublayers, compared with a 103.0M-parameter dense GPT-style baseline used in the evaluation. The base v7 model trains stably and exposes centroid usage, transition structure, and source-to-target movement as directly inspectable quantities of the forward computation. It remains behind the larger dense baseline in validation loss and perplexity (3.5995/36.58 vs. 3.2903/26.85), while showing close zero-shot benchmark behavior under the evaluated setting. These results are not intended as a state-of-the-art claim; they support the viability and structural interpretability of replacing dense within-token transformation with graph-mediated memory navigation. Broader scaling, optimized kernels, and more extensive benchmark evaluation are left for subsequent work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  3. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  4. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  5. 2024A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Modelscited by 163
  6. 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
  7. 2024MemoryFormer: Minimize Transformer Computation by Removing Fully-Connected Layerscited by 5
  8. 2025Neuron-Guided Interpretation of Code LLMs: Where, Why, and How?cited by 5
  9. 2026MemoryLLM: Plug-n-Play Interpretable Feed-Forward Memory for Transformerscited by 5
  10. 2024Exploring Activation Patterns of Parameters in Language Modelscited by 3
  11. 2026Prototype Transformer: Towards Language Model Architectures Interpretable by Designcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.