mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Activation Patterns of Parameters in Language Models

arXiv 2405.17799 ↗First posted 28 May 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most work treats large language models as black boxes without in-depth understanding of their internal working mechanism. In order to explain the internal representations of LLMs, we propose a gradient-based metric to assess the activation level of model parameters. Based on this metric, we obtain three preliminary findings. (1) When the inputs are in the same domain, parameters in the shallow layers will be activated densely, which means a larger portion of parameters will have great impacts on the outputs. In contrast, parameters in the deep layers are activated sparsely. (2) When the inputs are across different domains, parameters in shallow layers exhibit higher similarity in the activation behavior than deep layers. (3) In deep layers, the similarity of the distributions of activated parameters is positively correlated to the empirical data relevance. Further, we develop three validation experiments to solidify these findings. (1) Firstly, starting from the first finding, we attempt to configure different prune ratios for different layers, and find this method can benefit model pruning. (2) Secondly, we find that a pruned model based on one calibration set can better handle tasks related to the calibration task than those not related, which validate the second finding. (3) Thirdly, Based on the STS-B and SICK benchmark, we find that two sentences with consistent semantics tend to share similar parameter activation patterns in deep layers, which aligns with our third finding. Our work sheds light on the behavior of parameter activation in LLMs, and we hope these findings will have the potential to inspire more practical applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2024.

Builds on

31 of 40 references.

References · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  10. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  11. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  12. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
19 more
  1. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  2. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  3. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  4. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  5. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  6. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
  7. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  8. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
  9. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
  10. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  11. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
  12. 2023A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Modelscited by 269
  13. 2023Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 251
  14. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 209
  15. 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 156
  16. 2021MoEfication: Transformer Feed-forward Layers are Mixtures of Expertscited by 152
  17. 2018Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representationcited by 146
  18. 2023What Matters In The Structured Pruning of Generative Language Models?cited by 30
  19. 2023Causality Analysis for Evaluating the Security of Large Language Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Unraveling Babel: Exploring Multilingual Activation Patterns of LLMs and Their Applications
  2. 2024Activation Scaling for Steering and Interpreting Language Models
  3. 2026Weight-Adjusted Gradients Reveal Parameter Importance and Failure Modes in LLMs
  4. 2025What Affects the Effective Depth of Large Language Models?
  5. 2026Rethinking Layer Relevance in Large Language Models Beyond Cosine Similarity
  6. 2025A Refined Analysis of Massive Activations in LLMs
  7. 2026One Adapter Pair per Model: A Universal Activation Interface for Language Models
  8. 2026WiSparse: Boosting LLM Inference Efficiency with Weight-Aware Mixed Activation Sparsity