mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparative Study of Weighted and Coupled Second- and Fourth-Order PDEs for Image Despeckling in Grayscale, Color, SAR, and Ultrasound

arXiv 2604.23612 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Medical imaging and segmentation

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial Differential Equation (PDE)-based approaches have gained significant attention in image despeckling due to their strong capability to preserve structural details while suppressing noise. However, conventional second-order PDE models tend to generate blocky artifacts, whereas higher-order models often introduce speckle patterns. To resolve it, this paper proposes and comparatively analyzes two advanced PDE-based frameworks designed for speckle noise suppression while preserving the fine edges. The first model introduces a novel weighted formulation that combines second and fourth-order PDEs through a weighting parameter. The second-order diffusion coefficient employs grayscale and gradient-based indicators, while the fourth-order term is guided solely by a Laplacian-based indicator. The second model constructs a coupled PDE framework, where independent fourth and second-order components are explicitly solved in an iterative manner. In this coupled structure, each diffusion coefficient is defined separately to enhance adaptability in varying image regions. Both models are implemented using the explicit finite difference method. The proposed techniques are extensively evaluated on a variety of datasets, including standard grayscale, color, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and ultrasound images. Comparative experiments with the existing Telegraph Diffusion Model (TDM) and Fourth-Order Telegraph Diffusion Model (TDFM) demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approaches in reducing speckle noise while effectively preserving fine image structures and edges. Quantitative evaluations using PSNR, SSIM and Speckle Index metrics confirm that the proposed models produce higher image quality and enhanced visual perception. Overall, the presented PDE-based formulations provide a reliable and efficient framework for image despeckling in both natural and medical imaging.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical imaging and segmentation, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 38 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017SAR image despeckling through convolutional neural networkscited by 30
  2. 2020Speckle2Void: Deep Self-Supervised SAR Despeckling with Blind-Spot Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
  3. 2017SAR Image Despeckling Using a Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 24
  4. 2021A review of deep-learning techniques for SAR image restorationcited by 5
  5. 2020deSpeckNet: Generalizing Deep Learning Based SAR Image Despecklingcited by 4
  6. 2025New Fourth-Order Grayscale Indicator-Based Telegraph Diffusion Model for Image Despecklingcited by 3
  7. 2019A Fuzzy Edge Detector Driven Telegraph Total Variation Model For Image Despecklingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Coupled Fourth Order Telegraph Diffusion Framework Using Grayscale Indicators for Image Despeckling
  2. 2026IRSDE-Despeckle: A Physics-Grounded Diffusion Model for Generalizable Ultrasound Despeckling
  3. 2023SDDPM: Speckle Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
  4. 2023Diffusion Reconstruction of Ultrasound Images with Informative Uncertainty
  5. 2024Ultrasound Image Enhancement with the Variance of Diffusion Models
  6. 2023Deep Ultrasound Denoising Using Diffusion Probabilistic Models
  7. 2024Denoising Plane Wave Ultrasound Images Using Diffusion Probabilistic Models
  8. 2023Content-Preserving Diffusion Model for Unsupervised AS-OCT image Despeckling