Hierarchical Spatio-Channel Clustering for Efficient Model Compression in Medical Image Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become increasingly difficult to deploy in resource-constrained environments due to their large memory and computational requirements. Although low-rank compression methods can reduce this burden, most existing approaches compress spatial and channel redundancy independently and therefore do not fully exploit the localised structure within convolutional feature maps. This paper proposes a hierarchical spatio-channel low-rank compression framework for CNNs that exploits redundancy across spatial regions and channel activations. Unlike conventional methods, which apply a uniform decomposition across an entire layer, the proposed approach first partitions feature maps into spatial regions, then groups channels according to their co-activation patterns within each region, and finally applies rank-adaptive SVD to each resulting spatio-channel cluster. The method is evaluated on an AlexNet-based brain tumour MRI classification model and compared with Global SVD and Tucker decomposition under (3×) and (6×) compression budgets. Our method outperforms both baselines, reducing FLOPs from (8.21,G) to (1.55,G) ((81.1%) reduction), achieving a (1.38×) inference speed-up, and increasing classification accuracy from (87.76%) to (89.80%). The method also improves the macro (F1)-score and performance on challenging classes such as meningioma. A hyper-parameter trade-off analysis demonstrates that the framework provides Pareto-optimal configurations, enabling control over the balance between compression and predictive performance. Moderate clustering with adaptive rank selection yields strong results. Bootstrap standard errors are reported for all classification metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 521
- 2014Exploiting Linear Structure Within Convolutional Networks for Efficient Evaluationcited by 304
- 2014Speeding up Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Rank Expansionscited by 283
- 2015Compression of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast and Low Power Mobile Applicationscited by 161
- 2021Efficient Deep Learning: A Survey on Making Deep Learning Models Smaller, Faster, and Bettercited by 153
- 2022Compute-Efficient Deep Learning: Algorithmic Trends and Opportunitiescited by 38
- 2021Compressing Neural Networks: Towards Determining the Optimal Layer-wise Decompositioncited by 33
- 2018GroupReduce: Block-Wise Low-Rank Approximation for Neural Language Model Shrinkingcited by 32
6 more
- 2015Training CNNs with Low-Rank Filters for Efficient Image Classificationcited by 25
- 2018Online Embedding Compression for Text Classification using Low Rank Matrix Factorizationcited by 22
- 2018Exploring Linear Relationship in Feature Map Subspace for ConvNets Compressioncited by 11
- 2020Deep Learning Meets Projective Clusteringcited by 10
- 2022Survey: Exploiting Data Redundancy for Optimization of Deep Learningcited by 6
- 2024MCUBERT: Memory-Efficient BERT Inference on Commodity Microcontrollerscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.