mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Secure On-Premise Deployment of Open-Weights Large Language Models in Radiology: An Isolation-First Architecture with Prospective Pilot Evaluation

arXiv 2604.22768 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2026cs.CY cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: To design, implement, evaluate, and report on the regulatory requirements of a self-hosted LLM infrastructure for radiology adhering to the principle of least privilege, emphasizing technical feasibility, network isolation, and clinical utility. Materials and Methods: The isolation-first, containerized LLM inference stack relies on strict network segmentation, host-enforced egress filtering, and active isolation monitoring preventing unauthorized external connectivity. An accompanying deployment package provides automated isolation and hardening tests. The system served the open-weights DeepSeek-R1 model via vLLM. In a one-week pilot phase, 22 residents and radiologists were free to use 10 predefined prompt-templates whenever they considered them useful in daily work. Afterward, they rated clinical utility and system stability on an 0-10 Likert scale and reported observed critical errors in model output. Results: The applied institutional governance pathway achieved approval from clinic management, compliance, data protection and information security officers for processing unanonymized PHI. The system was rated stable and user friendly during the pilot. Source text-anchored tasks, such as report corrections or simplifications, and radiology guideline recommendations received the highest utility ratings, whereas open-ended conclusion generation based on findings resulted in the highest frequency of critical errors, such as clinically relevant hallucinations or omissions. Conclusion: The proposed isolation-first on-premise architecture enabled overcoming regulatory borders, showed promising clinical utility in text-anchored tasks and is the current base to serve open-weights LLMs as an official service of a German University Hospital with over 10,000 employees. The deployment package were made publicly available (https://github.com/ukbonn/ukb-gpt).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 82 references.

References · 6

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  4. 2020Backstabber's Knife Collection: A Review of Open Source Software Supply Chain Attackscited by 57
  5. 2023Automated clinical coding using off-the-shelf large language modelscited by 14
  6. 2025Open WebUI: An Open, Extensible, and Usable Interface for AI Interactioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MedFoundationHub: A Lightweight and Secure Toolkit for Deploying Medical Vision Language Foundation Models
  2. 2023Exploring the Trade-Offs: Unified Large Language Models vs Local Fine-Tuned Models for Highly-Specific Radiology NLI Task
  3. 2025Medical AI Consensus: A Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation and Evaluation
  4. 2025Scan-do Attitude: Towards Autonomous CT Protocol Management using a Large Language Model Agent
  5. 2024How Well Can Modern LLMs Act as Agent Cores in Radiology Environments?
  6. 2026A Utility-preserving De-identification Pipeline for Cross-hospital Radiology Data Sharing
  7. 2025Benchmarking and Adapting On-Device LLMs for Clinical Decision Support
  8. 2025Agentic Systems in Radiology: Design, Applications, Evaluation, and Challenges