mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Hybrid Nature of ABPMS Process Frames and its Implications on Automated Process Discovery

arXiv 2604.22455 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A core component of any AI-Augmented Business Process Management System (ABPMS) is the process frame, which gives the system process-awareness and defines its maximal behavioral boundaries. Compared to traditional process models, the process frame should, in principle, provide a somewhat more permissive representation of the managed processes, such that the (semi) autonomous behavior of an ABPMS, referred to as framed autonomy, could emerge. In addition, the process frame is not limited to a single linguistic or symbolic formalism and may incorporate heterogeneous knowledge ranging from predefined procedures to common sense rules and best practices. In this paper, we first conceptualize the ABPMS process frame as a hybrid business process representation, consisting of semi-concurrently executed procedural and declarative process models, extending the open-world assumption of the declarative paradigm also to procedural models. The latter allows any set of (non-conflicting) models of either type to be combined for execution, but complicates the automated discovery of these models from event data. Existing approaches for procedural models are particularly affected due to their reliance on observing directly-follows relations between pairs of activities. In search of an alternative, we present an in-depth analysis of how different procedural behaviors manifest as sets of discovered Declare constraints, each corresponding to a specific type of eventually-follows relation. This reveals behavioral overlaps between declarative and procedural models, while also laying the foundation for developing corresponding process (frame) discovery techniques.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

12 of 78 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Discovering Object-Centric Petri Netscited by 28
  2. 2022AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems: A Research Manifestocited by 28
  3. 2016Mining Local Process Modelscited by 10
  4. 2026Agentic Business Process Management: A Research Manifestocited by 8
  5. 2024Towards a Benchmark for Causal Business Process Reasoning with LLMscited by 7
  6. 2021Monitoring Hybrid Process Specifications with Conflict Management: The Automata-theoretic Approachcited by 4
  7. 2023Large Process Models: A Vision for Business Process Management in the Age of Generative AIcited by 4
  8. 2020Conformance Checking of Mixed-paradigm Process Modelscited by 3
  9. 2025Selecting the Right LLM for eGov Explanationscited by 3
  10. 2025XABPs: Towards eXplainable Autonomous Business Processescited by 3
  11. 2025Conversational Process Model Redesigncited by 2
  12. 2015Making Sense of Declarative Process Models: Common Strategies and Typical Pitfallscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.