Beyond Expected Information Gain: Stable Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design with Integral Probability Metrics and Plug-and-Play Extensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) provides a rigorous framework for decision-making tasks in which data acquisition is often the critical bottleneck, especially in resource-constrained settings. Traditionally, BOED typically selects designs by maximizing expected information gain (EIG), commonly defined through the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. However, classical evaluation of EIG often involves challenging nested expectations, and even advanced variational methods leave the underlying log-density-ratio objective unchanged. As a result, support mismatch, tail underestimation, and rare-event sensitivity remain intrinsic concerns for KL-based BOED. To address these fundamental bottlenecks, we introduce an IPM-based BOED framework that replaces density-based divergences with integral probability metrics (IPMs), including the Wasserstein distance, Maximum Mean Discrepancy, and Energy Distance, resulting in a highly flexible plug-and-play BOED framework. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that IPM-based utilities provide stronger geometry-aware stability under surrogate-model error and prior misspecification than classical EIG-based utilities. We also validate the proposed framework empirically, demonstrating that IPM-based designs yield highly concentrated credible sets. Furthermore, by extending the same sample-based BOED template in a plug-and-play manner to geometry-aware discrepancies beyond the IPM class, illustrated by a neural optimal transport estimator, we achieve accurate optimal designs in high-dimensional settings where conventional nested Monte Carlo estimators and advanced variational methods fail.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.
Builds on
37 of 87 references.
References · 37
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 407
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
- 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 202
- 2023Modern Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 121
- 2019Variational Bayesian Optimal Experimental Designcited by 116
- 2021Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 103
- 2019Wasserstein-2 Generative Networkscited by 96
- 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 88
25 more
- 2017On Nesting Monte Carlo Estimatorscited by 82
- 2021High-Dimensional Experimental Design and Kernel Banditscited by 55
- 2024Active Preference Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2018Efficient Bayesian Experimental Design for Implicit Modelscited by 34
- 2022Instance-Dependent Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Linear MDPs via Online Experiment Designcited by 33
- 2021Wasserstein Generative Learning of Conditional Distributioncited by 24
- 2024An Experimental Design Framework for Label-Efficient Supervised Finetuning of Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2015On the Computational Complexity of High-Dimensional Bayesian Variable Selectioncited by 18
- 2021Adaptive variational Bayes: Optimality, computation and applicationscited by 17
- 2014A Fast and Scalable Method for A-Optimal Design of Experiments for Infinite-dimensional Bayesian Nonlinear Inverse Problemscited by 14
- 2023Wasserstein Generative Regressioncited by 12
- 2025Adaptive Defense against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Bayesian Data Schedulercited by 12
- 2021Edge-promoting adaptive Bayesian experimental design for X-ray imagingcited by 10
- 2025Provable Diffusion Posterior Sampling for Bayesian Inversioncited by 8
- 2020Optimal design of acoustic metamaterial cloaks under uncertaintycited by 7
- 2025Bayesian optimal experimental design with Wasserstein information criteriacited by 7
- 2025PINS: Proximal Iterations with Sparse Newton and Sinkhorn for Optimal Transportcited by 5
- 2025Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approachcited by 5
- 2022Supervised Optimal Transportcited by 4
- 2024Expected information gain estimation via density approximations: Sample allocation and dimension reductioncited by 4
- 2013Selection and Estimation for Mixed Graphical Modelscited by 3
- 2025A Geometric Approach to Optimal Experimental Designcited by 2
- 2024PNOD: An Efficient Projected Newton Framework for Exact Optimal Experimental Designscited by 1
- 2025Data selection: at the interface of PDE-based inverse problem and randomized linear algebracited by 1
- 2026Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental Designcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.