mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2604.21495 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerical reasoning over expert-domain tables often exhibits high in-domain accuracy but limited robustness to domain shift. Models trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on specific datasets tend to rely on header-operation shortcuts rather than structural reasoning. We introduce TaNOS, a continual pre-training framework comprising three components: (i) header anonymization to reduce lexical memorization, (ii) operation sketches that provide minimal structural cues, and (iii) self-supervised pretraining that constructs correctness-guaranteed program-question pairs from given tables in a program-first manner. By decoupling domain semantics and numerical operation structure, TaNOS improves the transferability of numerical reasoning. Applied to an 8B instruction-tuned model, TaNOS achieves 80.13% execution accuracy on FinQA with only 10% train data, outperforming SFT baseline (73.97%) with full train data and proprietary models such as GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Pro. Furthermore, in the domain-shift experiments, TaNOS displays nearly-negligible cross-domain gap (<2pp) when standard SFT shows over 10pp gap. These results suggest that structural guidance with operation sketches, header-agnostic representations, and correctness-guaranteed self-supervision can improve the robustness of numerical reasoning across diverse expert-domain tables.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

20 of 27 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  5. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  6. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
  7. 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
  8. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
  9. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  10. 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 408
  11. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
  12. 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 264
8 more
  1. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  2. 2022ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answeringcited by 196
  3. 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
  4. 2022MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Datacited by 121
  5. 2022Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasonerscited by 116
  6. 2019NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoningcited by 59
  7. 2022ELASTIC: Numerical Reasoning with Adaptive Symbolic Compilercited by 14
  8. 2024Augment before You Try: Knowledge-Enhanced Table Question Answering via Table Expansioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.