Sink-Token-Aware Pruning for Fine-Grained Video Understanding in Efficient Video LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs) incur high inference latency due to a large number of visual tokens provided to LLMs. To address this, training-free visual token pruning has emerged as a solution to reduce computational costs; however, existing methods are primarily validated on Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) benchmarks, where coarse-grained cues often suffice. In this work, we reveal that these methods suffer a sharp performance collapse on fine-grained understanding tasks requiring precise visual grounding, such as hallucination evaluation. To explore this gap, we conduct a systematic analysis and identify sink tokens--semantically uninformative tokens that attract excessive attention--as a key obstacle to fine-grained video understanding. When these sink tokens survive pruning, they distort the model's visual evidence and hinder fine-grained understanding. Motivated by these insights, we propose Sink-Token-aware Pruning (SToP), a simple yet effective plug-and-play method that introduces a sink score to quantify each token's tendency to behave as a sink and applies this score to existing spatial and temporal pruning methods to suppress them, thereby enhancing video understanding. To validate the effectiveness of SToP, we apply it to state-of-the-art pruning methods (VisionZip, FastVid, and Holitom) and evaluate it across diverse benchmarks covering hallucination, open-ended generation, compositional reasoning, and MCQA. Our results demonstrate that SToP significantly boosts performance, even when pruning up to 90% of visual tokens.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.
Builds on
49 of 53 references.
References · 49
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,413
- 2023Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projectioncited by 1,402
- 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,109
- 2023Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Modelscited by 1,062
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
37 more
- 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 744
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 692
- 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 680
- 2024LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understandingcited by 665
- 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 642
- 2024LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Datacited by 583
- 2023LLaMA-VID: An Image is Worth 2 Tokens in Large Language Modelscited by 546
- 2025VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understandingcited by 518
- 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Modelscited by 402
- 2024LongVU: Spatiotemporal Adaptive Compression for Long Video-Language Understandingcited by 356
- 2024PLLaVA : Parameter-free LLaVA Extension from Images to Videos for Video Dense Captioningcited by 322
- 2024VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Modelscited by 313
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2024MLVU: Benchmarking Multi-task Long Video Understandingcited by 292
- 2025DivPrune: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Modelscited by 181
- 2025See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 132
- 2024DyCoke: Dynamic Compression of Tokens for Fast Video Large Language Modelscited by 96
- 2025Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMscited by 96
- 2024CG-Bench: Clue-grounded Question Answering Benchmark for Long Video Understandingcited by 85
- 2024PruneVid: Visual Token Pruning for Efficient Video Large Language Modelscited by 67
- 2025HoliTom: Holistic Token Merging for Fast Video Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2024EventHallusion: Diagnosing Event Hallucinations in Video LLMscited by 57
- 2025FastVID: Dynamic Density Pruning for Fast Video Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2025PACT: Pruning and Clustering-Based Token Reduction for Faster Visual Language Modelscited by 49
- 2025Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained Registerscited by 41
- 2025Multi-Granular Spatio-Temporal Token Merging for Training-Free Acceleration of Video LLMscited by 31
- 2024[CLS] Token Tells Everything Needed for Training-free Efficient MLLMscited by 26
- 2024STEP: Enhancing Video-LLMs' Compositional Reasoning by Spatio-Temporal Graph-guided Self-Trainingcited by 22
- 2025To Sink or Not to Sink: Visual Information Pathways in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 20
- 2026FlashVID: Efficient Video Large Language Models via Training-free Tree-based Spatiotemporal Token Mergingcited by 18
- 2025ARGUS: Hallucination and Omission Evaluation in Video-LLMscited by 16
- 2025MMG-Vid: Maximizing Marginal Gains at Segment-level and Token-level for Efficient Video LLMscited by 14
- 2025CompoDistill: Attention Distillation for Compositional Reasoning in Multimodal LLMscited by 14
- 2025VideoComp: Advancing Fine-Grained Compositional and Temporal Alignment in Video-Text Modelscited by 11
- 2025Artifacts and Attention Sinks: Structured Approximations for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 10
- 2026Why and When Visual Token Pruning Fails? A Study on Relevant Visual Information Shift in MLLMs Decodingcited by 7
- 2025Activation Quantization of Vision Encoders Needs Prefixing Registerscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AdaTP: Attention-Debiased Token Pruning for Video Large Language Models
- 2026FoveaTree: Information-Density Trees for Query-Guided Visual Token Pruning in Video Large Language Models
- 2025SpecVLM: Enhancing Speculative Decoding of Video LLMs via Verifier-Guided Token Pruning
- 2025Language-Guided Temporal Token Pruning for Efficient VideoLLM Processing
- 2023Long Video Understanding with Learnable Retrieval in Video-Language Models
- 2025StreamingAssistant: Efficient Visual Token Pruning for Accelerating Online Video Understanding
- 2025ShaRP: SHAllow-LayeR Pruning for Efficient Video Large Language Models
- 2026HieraVid: Hierarchical Token Pruning for Fast Video Large Language Models