Frequency-Forcing: From Scaling-as-Time to Soft Frequency Guidance
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
While standard flow-matching models transport noise to data uniformly, incorporating an explicit generation order - specifically, establishing coarse, low-frequency structure before fine detail - has proven highly effective for synthesizing natural images. Two recent works offer distinct paradigms for this. K-Flow imposes a hard frequency constraint by reinterpreting a frequency scaling variable as flow time, running the trajectory inside a transformed amplitude space. Latent Forcing provides a soft ordering mechanism by coupling the pixel flow with an auxiliary semantic latent flow via asynchronous time schedules, leaving the pixel interpolation path itself untouched. Viewed from the angle of improving pixel generation, we observe that forcing - guiding generation with an earlier-maturing auxiliary stream - offers a highly compatible route to scale-ordered generation without rewriting the core flow coordinate. Building on this, we propose Frequency-Forcing, which realizes K-Flow's frequency ordering through Latent Forcing's soft mechanism: a standard pixel flow is guided by an auxiliary low-frequency stream that matures earlier in time. Unlike Latent Forcing, whose scratchpad relies on a heavy pretrained encoder (e.g., DINO), our frequency scratchpad is derived from the data itself via a lightweight learnable wavelet packet transform. We term this a self-forcing signal, which avoids external dependencies while learning a basis better adapted to data statistics than the fixed bases used in hard frequency flows. On ImageNet-256, Frequency-Forcing consistently improves FID over strong pixel- and latent-space baselines, and naturally composes with a semantic stream to yield further gains. This illustrates that forcing-based scale ordering is a versatile, path-preserving alternative to hard frequency flows.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.
Builds on
15 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 14
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2021Cascaded Diffusion Models for High Fidelity Image Generationcited by 1,155
- 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,005
- 2024SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformerscited by 707
- 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 275
- 2015Deep Generative Image Models using a Laplacian Pyramid of Adversarial Networkscited by 214
- 2024FlowAR: Scale-wise Autoregressive Image Generation Meets Flow Matchingcited by 77
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Frequency-Aware Flow Matching for High-Quality Image Generation
- 2026WaiT for the Signal: Simple Frequency-Aware Flow-Matching
- 2025DeCo: Frequency-Decoupled Pixel Diffusion for End-to-End Image Generation
- 2025Scale-Adaptive Generative Flows for Multiscale Scientific Data
- 2026Balancing Frequencies and Pixels in Flow Matching
- 2026Energy-Guided Flow Matching
- 2026Show the Signal, Hide the Noise: Spectral Forcing for Pixel-Space Diffusion
- 2026FREPix: Frequency-Heterogeneous Flow Matching for Pixel-Space Image Generation