mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AVISE: Framework for Evaluating the Security of AI Systems

arXiv 2604.20833 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly deployed across critical domains, their security vulnerabilities pose growing risks of high-profile exploits and consequential system failures. Yet systematic approaches to evaluating AI security remain underdeveloped. In this paper, we introduce AVISE (AI Vulnerability Identification and Security Evaluation), a modular open-source framework for identifying vulnerabilities in and evaluating the security of AI systems and models. As a demonstration of the framework, we extend the theory-of-mind-based multi-turn Red Queen attack into an Adversarial Language Model (ALM) augmented attack and develop an automated Security Evaluation Test (SET) for discovering jailbreak vulnerabilities in language models. The SET comprises 25 test cases and an Evaluation Language Model (ELM) that determines whether each test case was able to jailbreak the target model, achieving 92% accuracy, an F1-score of 0.91, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.83. We evaluate nine recently released language models of diverse sizes with the SET and find that all are vulnerable to the augmented Red Queen attack to varying degrees. AVISE provides researchers and industry practitioners with an extensible foundation for developing and deploying automated SETs, offering a concrete step toward more rigorous and reproducible AI security evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Insights and Current Gaps in Open-Source LLM Vulnerability Scanners: A Comparative Analysis21 Oct
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models21 Feb

Other references · 15

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  3. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  4. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  5. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  6. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  7. 2023How FaR Are Large Language Models From Agents with Theory-of-Mind?cited by 75
  8. 2017Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Modelscited by 70
  9. 2024ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language Modelscited by 70
  10. 2024garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Modelscited by 48
  11. 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI Systemcited by 29
  12. 2025OpenAI's Approach to External Red Teaming for AI Models and Systemscited by 26
3 more
  1. 2024Unique Security and Privacy Threats of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 20
  2. 2025Attack and defense techniques in large language models: A survey and new perspectivescited by 13
  3. 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomycited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.