A Field Guide to Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-consequence decision making demands peak performance from individuals in positions of responsibility. Such executive authority bears the obligation to act despite uncertainty, limited resources, time constraints, and accountability risks. Tools and strategies to motivate confidence and foster risk tolerance must confront informational noise and can provide qualified accountability. Machine intelligence augments human cognition and perception to improve situational awareness, decision framing, flexibility, and coherence through agentic stewardship of contextual metadata. We examine systemic and behavioral factors crucial to address in scenarios encumbered by complexity, uncertainty, and urgency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.
Builds on
0 of 10 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Human aversion? Do AI Agents Judge Identity More Harshly Than Performance
- 2026From Information to Delegation: Mapping Human-AI Financial Decision Making
- 2026Think Before You Act -- A Neurocognitive Governance Model for Autonomous AI Agents
- 2026Act or Escalate? Evaluating Escalation Behavior in Automation with Language Models
- 2025An analysis of AI Decision under Risk: Prospect theory emerges in Large Language Models
- 2026The Moral Check: Strategic AI Governance for the Pacing Problem
- 2026Decoding the Human Factor: High Fidelity Behavioral Prediction for Strategic Foresight
- 2023Learning Complementary Policies for Human-AI Teams