Differentially Private Clustered Federated Learning with Privacy-Preserving Initialization and Normality-Driven Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) enables training of a global model while keeping raw data on end-devices. Despite this, FL has shown to leak private user information and thus in practice, it is often coupled with methods such as differential privacy (DP) and secure vector sum to provide formal privacy guarantees to its participants. In realistic cross-device deployments, the data are highly heterogeneous, so vanilla federated learning converges slowly and generalizes poorly. Clustered federated learning (CFL) mitigates this by segregating users into clusters, leading to lower intra-cluster data heterogeneity. Nevertheless, coupling CFL with DP remains challenging: the injected DP noise makes individual client updates excessively noisy, and the server is unable to initialize cluster centroids with the less noisy aggregated updates. To address this challenge, we propose PINA, a two-stage framework that first lets each client fine-tune a lightweight low-rank adaptation (LoRA) adapter and privately share a compressed sketch of the update. The server leverages these sketches to construct robust cluster centroids. In the second stage, PINA introduces a normality-driven aggregation mechanism that improves convergence and robustness. Our method retains the benefits of clustered FL while providing formal privacy guarantees against an untrusted server. Extensive evaluations show that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art DP-FL algorithms by an average of 2.9% in accuracy for privacy budgets (epsilon in {2, 8}).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 505
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 208
- 2022Federated Learning from Pre-Trained Models: A Contrastive Learning Approachcited by 141
8 more
- 2021Rethinking Architecture Design for Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 111
- 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
- 2021Differentially Private Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 74
- 2022Efficient Distribution Similarity Identification in Clustered Federated Learning via Principal Angles Between Client Data Subspacescited by 36
- 2022Scaling Language Model Size in Cross-Device Federated Learningcited by 25
- 2022FLAIR: Federated Learning Annotated Image Repositorycited by 22
- 2024DP-DyLoRA: Fine-Tuning Transformer-Based Models On-Device under Differentially Private Federated Learning using Dynamic Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 9
- 2024Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential Privacycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.