mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning-based Two-Stage Graph Sparsification for the Travelling Salesman Problem

arXiv 2604.20236 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-performance TSP solvers such as Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun (LKH) search within a candidate graph -- a small subset of edges pre-selected for the solver -- rather than over the complete graph. The two leading sparsification heuristics, α-Nearest and POPMUSIC, each fall short of the density-coverage balance: α-Nearest is dense with stable recall, while POPMUSIC is sparser but its recall degrades with scale. Their union closes the recall gap while remaining far below the complete graph in density, leaving room for further reduction. Existing learning-based sparsifiers score edges on the complete graph, an approach that is expensive and largely limited to Euclidean instances. We propose a two-stage method that inverts this logic. Stage~1 takes the union of α-Nearest and POPMUSIC, achieving near-perfect recall at ~6N edges. Crucially, the union annotates each edge with its source provenance -- whether it was endorsed by α-Nearest, POPMUSIC, or both. Stage~2 trains a lightweight classifier on these annotated edges and prunes the lowest-scoring ones. Because dual-source edges are almost always optimal, the learning problem reduces to filtering the single-source subset -- a substantially easier task than classifying all O(N2) edges from scratch. Across four distance types, five spatial distributions, and problem sizes from 50 to 500, the pipeline reduces candidate-graph density by 37-47% while retaining ≥99.69% of optimal-tour edges, and matches or exceeds the coverage of recent Euclidean-only neural sparsifiers at lower density at TSP500.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 646
  2. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 600
  3. 2019Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 313
  4. 2019An Efficient Graph Convolutional Network Technique for the Travelling Salesman Problemcited by 265
  5. 2023DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 216
  6. 2020Generalize a Small Pre-trained Model to Arbitrarily Large TSP Instancescited by 161
  7. 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 127
  8. 2021NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 102
  9. 2020Generalization of Machine Learning for Problem Reduction: A Case Study on Travelling Salesman Problemscited by 17
  10. 2025Learning to Reduce Search Space for Generalizable Neural Routing Solvercited by 14
  11. 2022Reinforced Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problemscited by 12
  12. 2021Learning to Sparsify Travelling Salesman Problem Instancescited by 9
6 more
  1. 2024Less Is More -- On the Importance of Sparsification for Transformers and Graph Neural Networks for TSPcited by 6
  2. 2014Edge Elimination in TSP Instancescited by 3
  3. 2024Dancing to the State of the Art? How Candidate Lists Influence LKH for Solving the Traveling Salesperson Problemcited by 2
  4. 2018Probabilistic Analysis of Edge Elimination for Euclidean TSPcited by 1
  5. 2023Local elimination in the traveling salesman problemcited by 1
  6. 2025Bandit based Dynamic Candidate Edge Selection in Solving Traveling Salesman Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.