mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Learning to Sparsify Travelling Salesman Problem Instances

arXiv 2104.09345 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2021cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In order to deal with the high development time of exact and approximation algorithms for NP-hard combinatorial optimisation problems and the high running time of exact solvers, deep learning techniques have been used in recent years as an end-to-end approach to find solutions. However, there are issues of representation, generalisation, complex architectures, interpretability of models for mathematical analysis etc. using deep learning techniques. As a compromise, machine learning can be used to improve the run time performance of exact algorithms in a matheuristics framework. In this paper, we use a pruning heuristic leveraging machine learning as a pre-processing step followed by an exact Integer Programming approach. We apply this approach to sparsify instances of the classical travelling salesman problem. Our approach learns which edges in the underlying graph are unlikely to belong to an optimal solution and removes them, thus sparsifying the graph and significantly reducing the number of decision variables. We use carefully selected features derived from linear programming relaxation, cutting planes exploration, minimum-weight spanning tree heuristics and various other local and statistical analysis of the graph. Our learning approach requires very little training data and is amenable to mathematical analysis. We demonstrate that our approach can reliably prune a large fraction of the variables in TSP instances from TSPLIB/MATILDA (>85%) while preserving most of the optimal tour edges. Our approach can successfully prune problem instances even if they lie outside the training distribution, resulting in small optimality gaps between the pruned and original problems in most cases. Using our learning technique, we discover novel heuristics for sparsifying TSP instances, that may be of independent interest for variants of the vehicle routing problem.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2021.

Builds on

10 of 33 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 884
  3. 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 648
  4. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 603
  5. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 327
  6. 2020Hybrid Models for Learning to Branchcited by 95
  7. 2020Generalization of Machine Learning for Problem Reduction: A Case Study on Travelling Salesman Problemscited by 17
  8. 2019Fine-grained Search Space Classification for Hard Enumeration Variants of Subset Problemscited by 7
  9. 2019Learning Multi-Stage Sparsification for Maximum Clique Enumerationcited by 6
  10. 2014Edge Elimination in TSP Instancescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

9 papers.