Cognitive Alignment At No Cost: Inducing Human Attention Biases For Interpretable Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For state-of-the-art image understanding, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have become the standard architecture but their processing diverges substantially from human attentional characteristics. We investigate whether this cognitive gap can be shrunk by fine-tuning the self-attention weights of Google's ViT-B/16 on human saliency fixation maps. To isolate the effects of semantically relevant signals from generic human supervision, the tuned model is compared against a shuffled control. Fine-tuning significantly improved alignment across five saliency metrics and induced three hallmark human-like biases: tuning reversed the baseline's anti-human large-object bias toward small-objects, amplified the animacy preference and diminished extreme attention entropy. Bayesian parity analysis provides decisive to very-strong evidence that this cognitive alignment comes at no cost to the model's original classification performance on in- (ImageNet), corrupted (ImageNet-C) and out-of-distribution (ObjectNet) benchmarks. An equivalent procedure applied to a ResNet-50 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) instead degraded both alignment and accuracy, suggesting that the ViT's modular self-attention mechanism is uniquely suited for dissociating spatial priority from representational logic. These findings demonstrate that biologically grounded priors can be instilled as a free emergent property of human-aligned attention, to improve transformer interpretability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.
Builds on
16 of 42 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 185
- 2024Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approachcited by 35
4 more
- 2025Better artificial intelligence does not mean better models of biologycited by 10
- 2022Human Eyes Inspired Recurrent Neural Networks are More Robust Against Adversarial Noisescited by 4
- 2025Vision Transformer attention alignment with human visual perception in aesthetic object evaluationcited by 2
- 2025SpiderNets: Vision Models Predict Human Fear From Aversive Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Attention Alignment Between Humans and Vision-Language Models
- 2026Bridging Human and Model Attention: Explainability Analysis of CNN, Mamba, and ViT Architectures with Gaze-Based Validation
- 2025Learning to Look: Cognitive Attention Alignment with Vision-Language Models
- 2023Attention, not scale, drives human-AI alignment in multimodal language prediction
- 2025Testing the Limits of Fine-Tuning for Improving Visual Cognition in Vision Language Models
- 2025Mechanistic Interpretability of Fine-Tuned Vision Transformers on Distorted Images: Decoding Attention Head Behavior for Transparent and Trustworthy AI
- 2024When Does Perceptual Alignment Benefit Vision Representations?
- 2026EVA: Bridging Performance and Human Alignment in Hard-Attention Vision Models for Image Classification