mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Look: Cognitive Attention Alignment with Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2509.21247 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) frequently "cheat" by exploiting superficial correlations, raising concerns about whether they make predictions for the right reasons. Inspired by cognitive science, which highlights the role of attention in robust human perception, recent methods have sought to guide model attention using concept-based supervision and explanation regularization. However, these techniques depend on labor-intensive, expert-provided annotations, limiting their scalability. We propose a scalable framework that leverages vision-language models to automatically generate semantic attention maps using natural language prompts. By introducing an auxiliary loss that aligns CNN attention with these language-guided maps, our approach promotes more reliable and cognitively plausible decision-making without manual annotation. Experiments on challenging datasets, ColoredMNIST and DecoyMNIST, show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on ColorMNIST and remains competitive with annotation-heavy baselines on DecoyMNIST, demonstrating improved generalization, reduced shortcut reliance, and model attention that better reflects human intuition.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

8 of 12 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  2. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  3. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  5. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  6. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  7. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 145
  8. 2023Concept Distillation: Leveraging Human-Centered Explanations for Model Improvementcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Attention Alignment Between Humans and Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Visual Attention Faithfulness in Vision-Language Models is Heterogeneous
  3. 2026Bridging Human and Model Attention: Explainability Analysis of CNN, Mamba, and ViT Architectures with Gaze-Based Validation
  4. 2024Unveiling Visual Perception in Language Models: An Attention Head Analysis Approach
  5. 2025Can Vision-Language Models Count? A Synthetic Benchmark and Analysis of Attention-Based Interventions
  6. 2025GLIMPSE: Holistic Cross-Modal Explainability for Large Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Learning to See What You Need: Gaze Attention for Multimodal Large Language Models
  8. 2026Not All Attention Is Equal: A Quantitative Survey of the EEI Trade-off