Talking to a Know-It-All GPT or a Second-Guesser Claude? How Repair reveals unreliable Multi-Turn Behavior in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Repair, an important resource for resolving trouble in human-human conversation, remains underexplored in human-LLM interaction. In this study, we investigate how LLMs engage in the interactive process of repair in multi-turn dialogues around solvable and unsolvable math questions. We examine whether models initiate repair themselves and how they respond to user-initiated repair. Our results show strong differences across models: reactions range from being almost completely resistant to (appropriate) repair attempts to being highly susceptible and easily manipulated. We further demonstrate that once conversations extend beyond a single turn, model behavior becomes more distinctive and less predictable across systems. Overall, our findings indicate that each tested LLM exhibits its own characteristic form of unreliability in the context of repair.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2026.
Builds on
10 of 34 references.
References · 10
- 2023Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaborationcited by 116
- 2024Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problemcited by 43
- 2023Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QAcited by 26
- 2022Python Code Generation by Asking Clarification Questionscited by 17
- 2024STYLE: Improving Domain Transferability of Asking Clarification Questions in Large Language Model Powered Conversational Agentscited by 17
- 2025LLMs Struggle to Reject False Presuppositions when Misinformation Stakes are Highcited by 12
- 2025Can LLMs Ground when they (Don't) Know: A Study on Direct and Loaded Political Questionscited by 10
- 2025Referential ambiguity and clarification requests: comparing human and LLM behaviourcited by 5
- 2024Clarifying the Path to User Satisfaction: An Investigation into Clarification Usefulnesscited by 4
- 2023Model Analysis & Evaluation for Ambiguous Question Answeringcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.